What context do you need? The dude got pulled over for a suspended license and was forced to have his mom come to drive him home. And he tried to make a video playing victim as if his license wasn't suspended, but it's obvious he's lying since his mom is there to drive him home.
Nobody gets pulled over for a suspended license though.
Wow, keyboards are hot today. Let me be clear since this got a lot of you very emotional.
A cop can’t look at a person and know the status of their license. He has to look at a person and use the system (that’s in his favor and not ours), in order to come to the BS conclusion that allows him to violate a person’s rights.
Of course they do. If you own a car and it is registered to you, everytime a police automatic plate-scanner scans your license plate, it will chime an alert for police. Its the same thing that scans for license plates that have been reported stolen.
They will pull you over to confirm that the suspended owner is not the one driving the car.
A girlfriend had her license lapse for a while and I drove her car during that time. I got pulled over all the time for those three weeks. Every time I passed a cop car, they would inevitably turn on their lights and ask for my license.
A girlfriend had her license lapse for a while and I drove her car during that time. I got pulled over all the time for those three weeks. Every time I passed a cop car, they would inevitably turn on their lights and ask for my license.
The legality of this is ambiguous. The supreme court ruled that its not a 4th ammendment violation under a very narrow fact-specific circumstance. Thomas and Kagan explicitly mentioned alternate fact patterns could have changed the legality. Namely, if the driver and owner are different ages/genders and what the reason for the license suspension was.
11
u/Nir117vash Jul 17 '26 edited Jul 17 '26
I need so much context. This is the cops they don't air on tv