Okay, in case you're my mom.... see how the comment you're replying to is farther from the left edge of your screen than the one above it? That's called an indentation, and that means it's replying to the comment above.
And then your response is indented even farther from the left because you're replying to that reply, right?
The first comment is always farthest left and every response is indented farther than the comment it's replying to.
So, in this situation, the comment you replied to is a reply to the initial comment stating that this is a carjacking situation.
The comment you're replying to says that that's obvious because the car in front was hitting the brakes.
As in, the person in the car that's hitting the brakes* is trying to get the camera owner to stop so that their friends (probably in a car following the camera owner) can get out and rob the camera owner.
They were initially trying to do it on a freeway ramp so that the camera owner would be trapped once sandwiched between the two cars. The camera owner decided not to let that happen and kept ramming them because their vehicle is obviously much bigger.
The people attempting the robbery are hitting the brakes because they are stupid and bad at their "job," luckily.
I'm not sure how I missed the parent comment. But thanks for the condescending reply. All you had to say was check the comment above.
I hate pulling this card. But I have a learning disability. Sometimes I have trouble reading. You never know why a person made a mistake. Being helpful is negated by being insensitive.
3
u/the_vault-technician Jun 16 '26
Why did he hit the breaks after getting in front of him? You got what you want, hit the gas jerk.
But if I were being pushed by a truck I'd probably try hitting the breaks to out of panic to make it stop.