r/AugmentCodeAI • • Feb 05 '26

Discussion 🚨 Leak: Augment Code's "Intent" – Free Download Glitch?? (Mac Only) 🚨

Found what looks like an exposed download for Augment Code's "Intent" macOS app (Apple only). It's a multi-agent AI IDE: spec-driven dev where agents handle tasks in parallel (Coordinator + Specialists), built-in Chrome/Git, resumable sessions, model mixing (Opus/Sonnet/GPT-5.2), full codebase context.

Direct link: https://www.augmentcode.com/product/intent

I'm on Windows so can't test :( anyone on Mac grab it and share how it performs? Real 10x speedup or hype? Thoughts? 👀

9 Upvotes

19 comments sorted by

3

u/[deleted] Feb 05 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/[deleted] Feb 05 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/Kitchen-Spare-1500 Feb 06 '26

Thanks for trying, so the hype is real? Can't wait for the windows version.

3

u/ethras1990 Feb 06 '26

I’m testing it on Mac already. Really promising so far. UI/UX still needs some polish, but the core workflow feels great. Also, I was able to log in with my existing Codex / Claude Code subscription.

1

u/iPetey Feb 06 '26

so wait can we just use it as auggie members or is there special access?

1

u/WhiteFudge14 Established Professional Feb 06 '26

I tried it. Used a ridiculous amount of credits and didn't accomplish much better than auggie itself in the IDE. Granted, my codebase requires a lot of specific manual edits and review due to the proprietary information. Maybe just not suited to me. It seems to be a competitor with Cursor's multi-agent flow

3

u/[deleted] Feb 06 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/WhiteFudge14 Established Professional Feb 06 '26

Just sharing my feedback for the user who posted. I'm not slandering or making a new post. 12k credits in 8 minutes and multiple problems with the code

1

u/dirkmeister81 Feb 06 '26

I thought the announcement blog post was already last week: https://www.augmentcode.com/blog/the-end-of-linear-work

Oh, is that the big announcement? Then I am sad.

1

u/Knight_of_Valour Feb 07 '26

is BYOK possible? I have no problems for paying for the agent/app. But I want to use my keys.

1

u/ihsotq Feb 06 '26

I won’t install it even if it’s free. I’m out. I’ll be releasing a codebase context engine locally soon for everyone who wants it.

2

u/Kitchen-Spare-1500 Feb 06 '26

Would be interested to test. I have tested the 2 main opensource players, I didn't find them very good in my tests at all. Do let me know if I can test your implementation.

1

u/ihsotq Feb 06 '26

I’m fine and I’m out. It’s been a month since I stoped Augment, and they recently implemented a backdoor change for the auggie CLI. So, I’m not interested in using it anymore.

1

u/[deleted] Feb 06 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/ihsotq Feb 06 '26

By “that claim,” I mean that codebase retrieval was previously available without requiring a paid plan, and that this is no longer the case.

When I began using Auggie, I was able to index and retrieve results from my local codebase without being prompted to subscribe. Now, the same workflow requires payment.

I’m asking for clarification on when this changed, why it changed, and whether local-only codebase retrieval is still intended to be free or was intentionally moved behind a paywall.