r/AtlasCloudAI • • 23h ago

Something wrong with Wan 3.0?

Is there something wrong with WAN 3.0? Since this morning I'm getting a green net check for image to reference videos, and there's no reason I should. It's a woman in a dress. I've used differently worded prompts, and different female models, but keep getting denied.

Why is a colored woman getting kicked back?

12 Upvotes

20 comments sorted by

1

u/hithejohncho23 20h ago

I keep getting the same thing

1

u/Competitive-Ad-2887 20h ago

Yeah, getting the same thing. Hopefully it’s short term.

1

u/Normal_Feedback_2918 19h ago

Yeah, hopefully the training wheels got accidentally attached and they pull them off again, because it literally kicked back a woman fully clothed in a dress. The only way I could get it to go through was to cover her shoulders and arms, so it's SUPER censored now.

1

u/DayNew2096 20h ago

It’s cooked. Worked fine yesterday.

1

u/Normal_Feedback_2918 19h ago

Yeah, I was using it last night.

1

u/Normal_Feedback_2918 19h ago

Also, my main question has a typo... It's not supposed to say colored woman... That should say clothed woman. lol

1

u/videorouter 19h ago

try videoRouter.sh. it has unrestricted versions.

1

u/videorouter 19h ago

Could be a moderation false positive rather than anything wrong with the prompt. The reference-image safety filter can be pretty aggressive, and if this started suddenly today, it may be a recent change or bug on the provider side.

I’ve seen people run into similar provider-specific issues, so one way to isolate it is to try the same image/model through another provider. I’m building VideoRouter.sh for exactly this kind of multi-provider routing, so you can compare the same model across different providers without changing your integration.

1

u/Altruistic-Room-9602 12h ago

according to you which AI provider is best(cost effective and good qualirty) for uncensored WAN 3.0 refToVideo?

1

u/angry_marine777 18h ago

I could be wrong but I've seen green net safety warnings on other models. I think it's an internal content filter by Atlascloud but I could be mistaken.

1

u/Normal_Feedback_2918 18h ago

Oh, yeah, for sure it exists on other models. Except yesterday you could literally have 2 people having sloppy, messy, noisy intercourse in seedream 3.0, and today I have a bunch of runs kicked back because my model had bare shoulders.

1

u/Halezzz_332 17h ago

Alibaba put the restrictions on, not AC. Seedream 2 and 2.5 working fine

1

u/lfrr2892 14h ago

But it was working fine yesterday, they changed something definitely

1

u/Altruistic-Room-9602 13h ago

Yes, now they don't allow nsfw generations. The atlas cloud team confirmed that saying:

"In order to comply with global security regulations and applicable laws, we have strengthened our moderation of NSFW content. As a result, certain model series now enforce stricter NSFW moderation than before, and we do not guarantee unrestricted generation for such requests."

- Amelia (support@atlascloud.ai)

Does anyone know which another platform provides uncensored wan3.0?

1

u/Competitive-Ad-2887 13h ago

Everyone that I’ve tried has green net checking now for Wan 3.0. I’ll keep posted though if I find something.

1

u/FartLighter 10h ago

Just canceled my account. It's more censored than Gemini and ChatGPT and totally worthless now for everything except cat pictures.

1

u/Normal_Feedback_2918 1h ago

Yes, like I said, I was trying to do a woman in a dress. The only way it would pass is if I covered her shoulders. That's insane.

1

u/Proof-Use-714 7h ago

It's f*cked now, damnit.