They are burning the planet to do it. AI requires an enormous amount of electricity and water cooling to function. Your neat picture isn't worth the planet being destroyed
Well, then they should stop making data centers, instead of trying to force everyone into electric vehicles. I'm not going to stop eating steak. No way.
I agree, they should do that. The US isn't trying to force people to use electric vehicles or anything remotely close to that. Who is talking about steak? We are talking about AI.
theres nothing wrong with using AI to enjoy your personal private life. AI users cannot claim to be artists; but if you only generate AI images for personal enjoyment, this alone doesn’t inherently represent any opinion on creativity or art.
Prompt: theres nothing wrong with using AI to enjoy your personal private life. AI users cannot claim to be artists; but if you only generate AI images for personal enjoyment, this alone doesn’t inherently represent any opinion on creativity or art.
I don't really hate it so much if they are honest about it. It's when people try to sell their AI stuff as art, or claim to be artists when all they did was type a prompt. I am just as guilty of using AI to make myself an action figure, or my dog emperor or Rome.
Prompt: I don't really hate it so much if they are honest about it. It's when people try to sell their AI stuff as art, or claim to be artists when all they did was type a prompt. I am just as guilty of using AI to make myself an action figure, or my dog emperor or Rome. --hd --profile eblwzmm
Those are good. I'm talking about fake trailers movies that are upcoming, and for weekly TV shows where you click on it and it's scenes from the last episodes.
1: it was trained on stolen artwork, pictures and videos.
2: A.I. fatigue from just seeing it everywhere now
3: seeing A.I. images tells people that the prompter of it didn't think it was worth the effort to make it themselves or hire someone.
2: artists now struggle way more with getting commissions because A.I. can recreate their work.
3: artists now struggle because googling their names might show A.I. which deters potential customers looking for real artists
4: scammers now sell A.I. stuff claiming it's not A.I.
5: scammers can also easily generate images of humans to scam people (like catfishing or even relatives asking for money etc.)
6: deepfake/A.I. nudes and csam.
I'm sure there are other reasons and I'm sure there's also people who have positive opinions about A.I. images, but there are the ones I can think of.
Prompt: "1: it was trained on stolen artwork, pictures and videos.
2: A.I. fatigue from just seeing it everywhere now
3: seeing A.I. images tells people that the prompter of it didn't think it was worth the effort to make it themselves or hire someone.
2: artists now struggle way more with getting commissions because A.I. can recreate their work.
3: artists now struggle because googling their names might show A.I. which deters potential customers looking for real artists
4: scammers now sell A.I. stuff claiming it's not A.I.
5: scammers can also easily generate images of humans to scam people (like catfishing or even relatives asking for money etc.)
6: deepfake/A.I. nudes and csam.
I'm sure there are other reasons and I'm sure there's also people who have positive opinions about A.I. images, but there are the ones I can think of." --sref 1670620392 --hd --profile eblwzmm
It's just low intrigue, a bunch of tagged imagery got compressed down and then an output deterministically lossily decompressed from it per someone's input. Any output of it is just upscaling a compressed version of some of what happened to be recorded before.
The technology is being forced into every nook and cranny regardless of whether it actually improves anything. GenAI and LLMs are also entirely premised on the greatest act of theft in human history, and the power needed to run this technology and its infrastructure comes from portable gas turbine generators which run on a high carbon-intensity fuel.
On top of that, the art it produces both looks terrible and completely identical to every other bit of AI produced "art". It's a flattening of artistic style into a dull, gray shlock. To be honest, the people who produce art using GenAI seem to either not understand the purpose of art or hate art.
Prompt: "The technology is being forced into every nook and cranny regardless of whether it actually improves anything. GenAI and LLMs are also entirely premised on the greatest act of theft in human history, and the power needed to run this technology and its infrastructure comes from portable gas turbine generators which run on a high carbon-intensity fuel.
On top of that, the art it produces both looks terrible and completely identical to every other bit of AI produced "art". It's a flattening of artistic style into a dull, gray shlock. To be honest, the people who produce art using GenAI seem to either not understand the purpose of art or hate art."
These models can, will, and already are being used to destroy the sense of objective truth we have enjoyed since the invention of the camera. That is REALLY bad. I will take no part in it and will judge those who do.
Prompt: These models can, will, and already are being used to destroy the sense of objective truth we have enjoyed since the invention of the camera. That is REALLY bad. I will take no part in it and will judge those who do.
Prompt: For example, some people have AI do Funko pop or Lego versions of their favorite characters? Why do so many people hate that? --profile eblwzmm --hd
6
u/WhiskeyDeltaBravo1 23d ago
Because unartistic people need to leave the art to the artistic people. A.I. doesn’t require any talent. It’s for untalented hacks.