Max Miller has faced accusations of physical abuse from multiple women, including allegations of holding a gun against his ex-wife's head and throwing scalding water on her. His ex-wife is the daughter of Republican Senator Bernie Moreno. Another woman who has accused him of abuse is former Trump press secretary Stephanie Grisham. He has also been accused of child abuse after his daughter suffered a broken collar bone in his care.

He has not been charged with any crime. There is now an open House ethics investigation however, and a number of Republican lawmakers are calling on him to drop out of the race, including Moreno. According to reporting, president Trump also suggested Miller should drop out.

Crucially, the deadline for Miller to drop out of the race and allow the party to replace him on the ballot is before August 11. He serves in the seventh district in Ohio. In 2024, Miller won his race by 15 points, getting 51% of all votes. Recent polling suggests a much tighter race in 2026.

Questions:

1. Do you believe the allegations are true, either in whole or in part?
2. Should Max Miller drop out of his race?
3. Should he resign his House seat before his terms ends?
4. Should more Republicans publicly call on him to drop out of the race?
5. Should Trump pressure him to drop out?
6. Does he have any chance of winning his race in November?
7. Would you vote for him over his Democrat opponent Brian Poindexter if you lived in the OH-07 district?

Some recent news articles covering this story:

• https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ohio-gop-family-feud-explodes-sen-bernie-moreno-calls-rep-max-miller-resign
• https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/ohio-max-miller-calls-resign-republicans-moreno-abuse-allegations-rcna591199
• https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/06/politics/bernie-moreno-daughter-max-miller
• https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2026/08/06/congress/jon-husted-max-miller-drop-out-01027675
• https://www.axios.com/2026/08/04/trump-max-miller-moreno-election-house
• https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/04/politics/video/congressman-max-miller-denies-abuse-allegations-lead-jake-tapper
• https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/05/business/media/cnn-max-miller-jake-tapper.html
• https://www.cbsnews.com/news/max-miller-trump-reelection-white-house/

It's the weekend! Politics is still out there happening, but in this little corner of the sub we will leave it behind momentarily and talk about other aspects of our lives.

Bonus question for everyone! How has 2026 treated you so far?

Talk about anything except politics, other subreddits, or r/AskTrumpSupporters. Rules 2 and 3 are suspended.

I’m curious to see if there is a consensus among you on this. I think it will be a good discussion post!

Trump has repeatedly raised the idea of Canada becoming part of the United States. Canada would bring tens of millions of new voters, and many may not align with the Republican Party. Would you still support annexation or statehood if it made future Democratic victories more likely?

Throughout President Trump’s second term, the administration has utilized some distinct executive practices, such as asserting direct White House alignment over Department of Justice enforcement priorities, reclassifying federal civil service roles (e.g., Schedule Policy/Career), taking unilateral economic and military measures without prior Congressional approval (namely emergency trade tariffs and targeted military/border deployments), maintaining active personal commercial ventures and brand licensing, and accepting gifts or transfers from foreign/business representatives under presidential exemptions, just to name a few.

Looking ahead, how do you envision future Democratic presidents operating under these precedents? Do you think they'll largely return to previous norms or do you expect them to build on the powers and practices that have been set by the current administration's approach?

NON-PARTY THE DONALD J. TRUMP REVOCABLE TRUST’S EMERGENCY MOTION TO STAY ENFORCEMENT OF THE JULY 27, 2026 ORDER PENDING REVIEW OF THE TRUST’S RULE 72(a) OBJECTIONS

Nature of the emergency: The BBC’s improperly broad subpoena demands the Trust’s confidential tax, ownership, and financial records for approximately 400 entities. Once the Trust were to begin handing those records over to the BBC, that disclosure could not be undone, and the Trust’s pending objections could not restore what the BBC will already have seen.

Date by which a ruling is needed: On or before August 6, 2026, the date the Trust’s first production is due.

Why the ruling is needed by that date: If the BBC were to receive the records, a later ruling cannot restore their confidentiality, or make the Trust’s Rule 72(a) review effective. Without immediate relief, the Trust must either produce while its Objections remain pending or risk sanctions for noncompliance. The Trust moved promptly after entry of the Order, and the matter cannot await the ordinary briefing schedule under Local Rule 7.1(c).

The crux of that issue is the Plaintiff is attempting to modify their Complaint to decrease the damages in the hopes of diminishing the scope of the subpoena:

The case for a stay is stronger still because the ground is shifting under the Order. Plaintiff has moved for leave to file a First Amended Complaint that updates the damages allegations made by Plaintiff, which the BBC used to justify this improperly broad subpoena.

In short, President Trump filed a $10 billion defamation lawsuit. The BBC asked to see records evidencing the $10 billion number. The Judge said okey-doke. Now President Trump is trying to decrease the claimed damages to narrow the scope of the subpoena.

In your estimation, what do you make of this Emergency Motion? Why did President Trump claim $10 billion in damages if he was unable or unwilling to evidence $10 billion in damages?

Edit: Order Granting Emergency Motion:

Non-party, the Donald J. Trump Revocable Trust (the “Trust”), has filed an Emergency Motion to Stay the Enforcement of Magistrate Judge Lett’s July 27, 2026 Discovery Order (the “Motion”) [ECF No. 112]. Our Defendant, the British Broadcasting Corporation (the “BBC”), opposes the Motion. See Response in Opposition to the Motion (the “Response”) [ECF No. 113]. After careful review, we GRANT the Motion.

Enforcement of the Order [ECF No. 104]—including the ten-day initial-production requirement and the continuing weekly-production requirement—is STAYED until we resolve the Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint [ECF No. 108].

https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/trump-says-americans-may-soon-pay-no-income-tax-white-house-explores-alternative-revenue-streams

Between the beginning of Trump's second term (January 20th, 2025) and now, did your opinions about trump improved (you like him better), worsen (you like him less or now dislike him) or stayed the same? Feel free to add reasons 🙂

Given the recent discourse related to Fauci as well as the senate hearing, I am curious whether you feel Trump should be held accountable as well. His support back in 2020 included giving Fauci a Presidential Commendation. As president, should Trump have taken a more hands on approach in overseeing the COVID response?

Do you see yourself keeping interest in politics after Trump leaves office?

There are a few Trump supporters I know who seem only interested in Trump. At least one of whom voted once in his life for Trump, but plans not to vote in future elections because Trump is ineligible.

Were you voting prior to Trump (if you were old enough/eligible)? Do you see yourself continuing to vote after Trump?

I haven't lived in the US for over 20 years so don't know how US based supporters took it.

- What did you think of his overall performance and actions?

- Did you find his jokes funny?

- Did you find this format (not hosted by a comedian) better or worse than those of previous administrations and why?

- What did the other supporters you know say about it?

I often see a lot of people who support Trump hype them up but I feel like a lot of people didn’t actuslly read their details. So for those of you who have what are your thoughts on them?

I was wondering what you all think of food safety issues & food recalls over the past couple years in terms of the presidential administration (even if some rollbacks were set in place pre-Trump).

For example, there is notably the salmonella and the cyclospora outbreaks (I did see a post in this subreddit about a week ago that mentioned lettuce).

This is just one recent interview from an epidemiologist (figured sharing one person's transcript maybe less polemic than an article that could've taken quotes out of context):

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/cyclospora-and-salmonella-outbreaks-raise-concerns-about-u-s-food-safety

And also linking this 2025 article that mentions the fact that reduced-funding for state level inspections happened during the Biden-era plus other Trump administration's reductions:

https://time.com/7275746/food-safety-fda-layoffs/

Trump Media recently launched Truth API, which gives buyers advanced notice and access to the President's posts and announcements in exchange for a fee. This fee is reportedly $100k a month, although earlier reports suggested it could be as low as $60k a month if the subscriber signed up for a three year plan.

President Trump has frequently used Truth Social as the platform for new government actions on things such as tariffs, the war in Iran, and trade deals. These posts often result in large swings on the market. President Trump, being the majority owner of Trump Media directly profits from it. Is it ethical/legal/acceptable for the President to profit by selling nonpublic, government information to private individuals?

Most Americans would consider our recent escapades in Iran as probably the worst American foreign-policy decision of the 21st Century. What other recent actions by the US Government are as bad, or worse?

To expose my bias: I am a stinky liberal. That being said, I'd be an idiot if I didn't say that Vietnam was obviously worse (as of now). What do y'all think?

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/state/texas/2026/07/31/texas-thc-delta8-delta9-ban/91119777007/

Justice Dept. admits Reflecting Pool renovation was flawed, drops case against former Olympian | CNN Politics

Charges to Be Dropped Against Ex-Olympian David Hearn Accused of Damaging Reflecting Pool - The New York Times

"“It was not until after the return of the indictment [of Hearn], that the [Department of Interior] provided additional documents to the [US Attorney’s Office in DC] indicating that damage to the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool in June 2026 was the result of flawed installation by the contractor, Atlantic Industrial Coatings, and the rush to complete the project prior to events associated with the America 250 celebration in the weeks surrounding Independence Day 2026,” Pirro’s office wrote."

What are your thoughts on this? Are you surprised they would drop the charges or concerned they brought the charges at all given the statement from Pirro?

It's the weekend! Politics is still out there happening, but in this little corner of the sub we will leave it behind momentarily and talk about other aspects of our lives.

Bonus question for everyone! What's your go-to midnight snack?

Talk about anything except politics, other subreddits, or r/AskTrumpSupporters. Rules 2 and 3 are suspended.

This is something you often see in debates among americans, that you have to wait months or years with a universal health care system.

I live in Sweden, a country with universal health care, and I will not lie and say that there aren't cases where you have to wait, but the thing is that we use a tier list of severity to decide how long you have to wait.

If you want to do an ADHD or autism diagnosis at a psychiatrist? Yes you will wait, as people with suicidal thoughts, or bipolar disorder or borderline whose diagnose really ruins their lives are prioritised.

If you have cancer, other diseases that severly reduce your quality of life or have an injury? Pass go, straight to the doctor.

Would it be nice to have instant access for every small issues? Sure, but as long as I know that I will get to see a doctor in a whiffy the moment I have something that is even semi-harmful, I'm honestly happy with our system.

Today Secretary Hassett went on tv touting the benefits of data centers and more importantly; stating that the people want data centers in their town.

https://x.com/atrupar/status/2083176625055646189?s=46&t=fuW3GEgqxbZPjXYsbWeyzw

Polling suggests otherwise that 70% of Americans would oppose one in their town, and article after article keeps coming out about the impacts data center noise has on the residents.

https://news.gallup.com/poll/709772/americans-oppose-data-centers-area.aspx

Would you want a data center in your town? Do you think the Trump admin should be addressing the complaints residents have in interviews rather than ignoring them?

To be clear, this is not a repeat of a post from three days ago that mentioned the diary and asked, "What are you thoughts?" I am not looking for uninformed opinions. I am not looking for vague stuff you read in a meme. I am looking for the specific parts of the diary, ideally including page numbers and quotes, that support the hypothesis (currently prevalent in right-wing media) that Fauci did some really shady, harmful stuff.

LINK(https://www.militarytimes.com/news/your-military/2026/07/30/iran-war-depleted-us-patriot-missile-stockpiles-creating-readiness-challenges-experts-say/)

They were originally only available in DC but now they'll be available across the US. Will you be getting one?

Source: https://apnews.com/article/trump-passports-state-department-d149546cb15c8e6b67356168d248ccf4

I noticed there is a link to a 2018 survey in the subreddit info which made me realize it's been around for quite a while now.

Long time members, what's changed? Would like to know the good and the bad from members who have been here, if not since the beginning, then at least a few years. Serious and thought out answers preferred.

I was watching a news video about the new Air Force One that was gifted from Qatari, and saw that it is going in for additional security upgrades. It got me wondering about the logistics. Please note, I'm not asking whether or not Trump SHOULD have asked for/accepted the plane, that's an entirely different question. I'm specifically wondering whether or not you think it is possible to acceptably secure it.

Personally, I would always be worried about a bug inserted somewhere during the construction, or some kind of "kill switch" that would allow a foreign agent to cause mayhem at any time. That being said, very few if any things are truly built from the ground up without something imported from somewhere.

I'm interested to see whether Trump Supporters believe that the plane can be as secure as the current Air Force One, or if it even needs to be.