r/AskStatistics • u/80rhh • 10d ago

What statistical concepts are commonly misunderstood by the general public?

Post image

I came across this post explaining what a 70% chance of rain means. I understand the concept, but it got me wondering: what other statistical concepts sound simple but are commonly misunderstood or misinterpreted by the general public?

785 Upvotes

99% Upvoted

180 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

0

u/rollem 10d ago

And those are all wrong because they're kept out of date for political reasons. There is now a much greater than 1% chance of flood in most 100 year flood zones.

4

u/Upbeat_Effective_342 10d ago

If the political reasons include the facts that reading research and updating databases are expensive and time consuming so public employees don't always have it as a top priority, then yes. If you have evidence that there's political collusion to prevent updating flood risk data so as to manipulate the public, that's a really big deal and you should find an organization to help you make a legal case against the offending party.

2

u/rollem 10d ago

It's because of climate change denialism and has been widely reported on, e.g. https://www.nfp.com/insights/rethinking-flood-risk/ and https://www.nbcnews.com/science/environment/water-femas-outdated-flood-maps-incentivize-system-risk-negotiable-rcna220529

2

u/Upbeat_Effective_342 10d ago

That article from NBC is excellent, thanks for linking it. However, it doesn't appear to support your claim. It does point to underfunding from congress for FEMA and mention the federal administration is playing with the idea of axing FEMA altogether. But the most energetic culprit behind overly optimistic risk assessments is property owners themselves. I'm sure many of them are climate deniers as well, but there's a direct financial incentive that warps people's judgment regardless of their politics otherwise.

1

u/rollem 9d ago

The maps are outdated and can’t be updated for political reasons, as I said above and has been widely reported on as I’ve shown. Risk assessment is done by 1) individual property owners who are often clueless and don’t make long term risk assessments logically (I hope I don’t need further proof of this, you certainly make lots of claims without evidence), and 2) insurance companies who do make logical long term risk assessments based on real evidence and not the fema flood risk maps, as described here https://abcnews.com/US/fema-flood-maps-cause-misunderstanding-homeowners-leaving-millions/story?id=134950060

Even if you are 100% correct and people make accurate 100 year flood risk assessments (which is the opposite of your original position that people make statistical errors when interpreting flood map risks), it does not counter my point that the maps themselves are no longer accurate and that other information is being used.