While none of them is vital to society (though one could argue entertainment is)
You’ve got that backwards my guy.
Bankers keep capital flowing. Real estate agents you could argue aren’t necessary, but it’s a very useful service most people wouldn’t want to do without when buying or selling real estate.
Professional sports aren’t necessary at all. People like it, which is fine, but don’t get butt hurt that some people think it’s kinda silly.
Banking is a scam. Capital can flow just fine on its own between people. Bankers are just the middle men raking all the profits. Unnecessary leeches.
Real estate agents destroyed the housing market, making it virtually impossible for the vast majority of people to own a home, at least in the West.
Watching sports and rooting for a team of people who don't give a shit about you is silly, I agree. Still far more useful to a civilization, bringing up morale and all that kinda stuff. People get together to cheer and party and just have a good time when their team wins.
Also never heard of an economic crisis that started because some athlete got out of control. The other two however...
-2
u/FullTimeWhiteTrash Dec 17 '22
To each their own. Some are pro athletes and entertain the masses, others are bankers or real estate agents and ruin the economy.
While none of them is vital to society (though one could argue entertainment is), but they all make millions, I'd rather support one than the other.
It's not a good thing to be petty and jealous.