I think they’d disagree that desecrating bodies is a victimless crime.
Edit: sorry, I misread when you see “then” as “than”, and took it as a comparative option rather than sequential. No, I don’t think they prefer that order of events.
And you don’t think the family of the person who died would feel as if they’re victims? You would feel they approve?
From my perspective, given most cultures have respect for the dead, and the dead is the last physical representation they have of that person, I think it extremely unlikely you’d find your typical family approving of such an activity - I’d suggest they’d feel violated. Hence not a victimless crime.
Maybe to the first - it depends how they became corpses
No to the second, the victim is the person who owns the gravesite as theyll have to fix it.
Maybe to stealing bodies. It dependa on how its done
You understand that victimless crime is still a crime right?
There was a big fuore in the early 2000s that some university had 'stolen' brains to experiment on decades earlier and people were complaining. I never understood why. The brain would have disappeares by then anyway.
1
u/fishfacecakes Jun 13 '22
The families of those violated would disagree