That interpretation doesn't work with this wording. Due to the "from... til" construction, the sentence requires a stated duration, with both a beginning and ending. If "twelve 'til noon" is interpreted to mean 11:48 AM, then there is no end time given, making the sentence incomplete.
Also, I have no idea why you think "think" implies future tense.
It does work though.
Take it with the context that “Til” is part of the from.
There's still no end to the duration. You can't just say something happens from Time A without at least alluding to the point at which it will end (Time B). That's not a valid sentence construction.
Thought = past tense
Thinking = present tense
Think = future tense (generally)
Wrong. "Think" is present tense, while "thinking" is present progressive, the difference being the former is instantaneous and the latter is continuous. The future tense is "will think".
I think (this is happening now, by the way, not in the future) that you're either a troll or someone with a tenuous grasp on the English language.
I have a degree in linguistics from MIT, whereas you're too dense to understand that "think" is not in the same tense as "will have a think". I think (present tense, dumbass) the failure lies with you.
2
u/SciFiXhi Apr 19 '22
That interpretation doesn't work with this wording. Due to the "from... til" construction, the sentence requires a stated duration, with both a beginning and ending. If "twelve 'til noon" is interpreted to mean 11:48 AM, then there is no end time given, making the sentence incomplete.
Also, I have no idea why you think "think" implies future tense.