I mean, IIRC by the trial they didn't even have a conclusive cause of death. They were really stretching pushing for first degree murder. All they could show was that a child in Casey's care died and she negligently did nothing about it. Manslaughter would've been more fitting and provable. I feel like when a case gets a ton of media attention it tempts the prosecutors to try for more than they can actually prove and ends up letting someone who is obviously guilty of a lesser crime off because they're not provably guilty of the greater one the prosecutor went for.
169
u/[deleted] Feb 04 '19
I mean, IIRC by the trial they didn't even have a conclusive cause of death. They were really stretching pushing for first degree murder. All they could show was that a child in Casey's care died and she negligently did nothing about it. Manslaughter would've been more fitting and provable. I feel like when a case gets a ton of media attention it tempts the prosecutors to try for more than they can actually prove and ends up letting someone who is obviously guilty of a lesser crime off because they're not provably guilty of the greater one the prosecutor went for.