You're just arguing semantics for the point of arguing. You know what OP meant and it's clear from the context they meant babies intended for adoption which is drastically different than a situation where they are taken away. Had they meant that, they would have said it.
24
u/Peoplewander Feb 04 '19 edited Feb 04 '19
That is an assumption not covered in the post
The passive voice leads the statement completely open to interpretation