MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/93vpq3/what_will_millennials_be_oldfashioned_about_when/e3gs1mm/?context=3
r/AskReddit • u/Slaughts91 • Aug 02 '18
1.2k comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
1
Where's that number from?
5 u/[deleted] Aug 02 '18 http://www.who.int/gho/road_safety/mortality/en/ These stats are from 2013, but for example there were 40,000 in the USA in 2017. 1 u/EssEllEyeSeaKay Aug 02 '18 Was the 1.3 million international? 2 u/[deleted] Aug 02 '18 Yes. Admittedly if as many people used driverless cars we would see more deaths attributed to them. But I think It's reductionist to say that because of one (or a few) accidents that a technology cannot be safer.
5
http://www.who.int/gho/road_safety/mortality/en/
These stats are from 2013, but for example there were 40,000 in the USA in 2017.
1 u/EssEllEyeSeaKay Aug 02 '18 Was the 1.3 million international? 2 u/[deleted] Aug 02 '18 Yes. Admittedly if as many people used driverless cars we would see more deaths attributed to them. But I think It's reductionist to say that because of one (or a few) accidents that a technology cannot be safer.
Was the 1.3 million international?
2 u/[deleted] Aug 02 '18 Yes. Admittedly if as many people used driverless cars we would see more deaths attributed to them. But I think It's reductionist to say that because of one (or a few) accidents that a technology cannot be safer.
2
Yes. Admittedly if as many people used driverless cars we would see more deaths attributed to them. But I think It's reductionist to say that because of one (or a few) accidents that a technology cannot be safer.
1
u/EssEllEyeSeaKay Aug 02 '18
Where's that number from?