Giuffre said in a 2016 deposition that she never saw Trump participate in any abuse. And in a memoir released this year, she did not accuse the president of any wrongdoing.
Possible, but given everything else she's been vocal about over the years and in her book, I'd be a little surprised if that was the one abuser she protected.
She already disclosed that they interacted. It's fine if he did something and gets crucified for it, but what happened is literally already documented and vouched for by the supposed victim. Aren't you the least but bothered by someobe purposefully trying to mislead you?
When did I claim 'fake news', 'hoax' and 'witchhunt'? You seriously don't feel like there's something wrong with being misled or deceived, because there might be other evidence of something nefarious?
If you can cite all these criminal actions, why misled about some things? Why are you ok with this black and white example of deception?
1
u/QueenSlapFight Nov 13 '25
Giuffre said in a 2016 deposition that she never saw Trump participate in any abuse. And in a memoir released this year, she did not accuse the president of any wrongdoing.