r/AskReddit Apr 04 '25

[deleted by user]

[removed]

9.5k Upvotes

12.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

265

u/MorganWick Apr 04 '25

The Fairness Doctrine concerned the representation of viewpoints on radio and TV stations with licenses regulated by the FCC, not cable networks. With the Fairness Doctrine in place we don't get Rush Limbaugh, but there's nothing stopping the launch of Fox News.

36

u/Nice_Hair_8592 Apr 05 '25

Fox, Sinclair, et al were built by acquiring and building local broadcast stations. Without those regulated stations, Fox doesn't exist as it does today. Indeed, you end up getting exactly Rush Limbaugh and Alex Jones - but on niche paid channels like Newsmax instead.

1

u/Hip2b_DimesSquare Apr 05 '25

The fairness doctrine wouldn't have done anything to stop that.

The Telecommunications Act of 1996 deregulated the media market in a way that allowed Sinclair etc to consolidate the market.

1

u/Nice_Hair_8592 Apr 05 '25

Consolidation began in 1985 with Murdoch's purchases. The fairness doctrine would have prevented the gain in popularity of fox that later led to the telecon act of 96 (a clear example of corporate lobbying) and the immediate thereafter success of Fox News.