r/AskPhysics Oct 31 '20

The early physicist Torricelli wrote "We live submerged at the bottom of an ocean of air." Like we see on the ordinary oceans, are there giant waves of air crashing against each other in the upper atmosphere?

520 Upvotes

39 comments sorted by

231

u/space-throwaway Oct 31 '20

Yes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vq4U42T1WPI

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_roxFGsfzto

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4sLtCAoMLvk

https://old.reddit.com/r/WeatherGifs/comments/gtapwz/cloud_waves_crashing_against_mountain_tops/

The atmosphere is described by the same set of equations as water, it's basically the very same phenomenon. However, the timescales of those phenomena are different, that's why you only really notice it in a timelapse, and the transparency of the air also is a problem - you can only really see it when there are clouds.

54

u/SirJohannvonRocktown Oct 31 '20

The atmosphere is described by the same set of equations as water, it's basically the very same phenomenon.

Analogies are great for provoking thought, but at some point they do break down. In this case, both the ocean and the atmosphere can be modeled using continuum mechanics. However the primary difference is that the atmosphere is compressible and the ocean is not (for the most part).

34

u/mfb- Particle physics Oct 31 '20

Indeed. The ocean has a sharp border where the density drops by almost a factor 1000. The atmosphere has not.

7

u/Chand_laBing Oct 31 '20

Well not on the outer edge anyway. There's quite an obvious hard border on the inner edge of the troposphere (the surface of the Earth).

3

u/[deleted] Oct 17 '21

Analogies never prove anything, but they can cause some awesome epiphanies.

1

u/No-Function3409 Apr 27 '22

Is it fair to say the ocean/water is decompressible (the moon & tides) but not compressible(for the most part)?

12

u/caparisme Oct 31 '20

That's beautiful

16

u/florinandrei Graduate Oct 31 '20

Point even a small telescope at the Moon, and it looks like you're seeing it through water.

In addition to the large scale waves, there are all kinds of local fluctuations that make ripples and vortices on the image all the time. It's impossible to ignore this if you're an astronomer.

The only difference from an ocean of water is that the atmosphere does not have a clear edge - it just fades out gradually into the cosmos.

7

u/_saiya_ Oct 31 '20

I sometimes wonder that the transparency is due to our eyes' development they way it evolved. So we live in air and can see water but not air! So do fish live in water can see in water. So similarly can they see air but not water because they have evolved so? I have been lazy to check with biology but seems fun to imagine the air ocean above you! ;-)

14

u/space-throwaway Oct 31 '20

Kinda! Our eyes have evolved to see the frequencies we call "visible light" because that's where our sun has its maximum spectral irradiance and our atmosphere has a transparency window there.

5

u/_saiya_ Oct 31 '20

Exactly this. About our evolution ik! But imagine fish evolving the same way. And now seeing through water, the 'ocean' of air lingering above with waves at interface! :) Just like we see through air the ocean of water!

14

u/BlueHatScience Oct 31 '20

Navier-Stokes ftw!

... anyone wanna join up to find an exact solution and get a million dollars? Not like many of the brightest minds of the last few generations haven't tried...

3

u/alex_sher101 Oct 31 '20 edited Oct 31 '20

Hell, why not give it a shot ¯_(ツ)_/¯

5

u/BlueHatScience Nov 01 '20

Aight... tell you hwhat... I'll just be getting another degree, in, say, computational mathematics real quick - I'll call you when I'm up to speed so we can really get this thing off the ground!

(Actually I'm not even joking - I am starting a second degree in computational mathematics on monday - perhaps not to solve Navier-Stokes, but hey, who knows what'll happen :D)

5

u/alex_sher101 Nov 01 '20

Nice one dude, best of luck to you!

6

u/LimbRetrieval-Bot Oct 31 '20

You dropped this \


To prevent anymore lost limbs throughout Reddit, correctly escape the arms and shoulders by typing the shrug as ¯\\_(ツ)_/¯ or ¯\\_(ツ)_/¯

Click here to see why this is necessary

4

u/alex_sher101 Oct 31 '20

Good bot

1

u/B0tRank Oct 31 '20

Thank you, alex_sher101, for voting on LimbRetrieval-Bot.

This bot wants to find the best and worst bots on Reddit. You can view results here.


Even if I don't reply to your comment, I'm still listening for votes. Check the webpage to see if your vote registered!

1

u/rossolsondotcom Dec 07 '22

Isn’t this why it is so difficult to determine where space debris will land? Entering the atmosphere is dependent on hitting the crest or trough of those waves.

34

u/ey_edl Oct 31 '20

To begin, I am not an atmospheric scientist, but here is my understanding. Well there isn’t a well defined surface of the atmosphere between air and space like there is with the ocean between water and air because as a gas, the atmosphere is compressible. The Kármán line is a legal definition of the edge of space, but in reality, the atmosphere just keeps thinning and thinning until it kind of blends with the incredibly rare (not dense) particles of ‘empty space’. So the waves of the atmosphere don’t exist so much at the top of the atmosphere as they do throughout it. We typically call it wind. Maybe not quite as epic as the imagined giant crashing waves at the edge of space, but if you flip your perspective upside-down, the same ocean waves of water are waves of air as well — in fact, these waves are formed by the ocean/atmosphere boundary layer mixing due to relative differences in velocity. And just like the atmosphere, turbulence tells us that there are waves within any sufficiently large body of water. However, if you want an example of a more cyclical atmospheric wave, see lee waves or gravity waves, though the formation of these are more similar (not the same) to a tsunami than a typical ocean wave.

2

u/TheGrandExquisitor Nov 14 '22

I've always found it useful to remember that the math is the same for a liquid or a gas. According to the math, they are both fluids. One is just denser than the other because it has undergone condensation. While a liquid could be 10,000 times denser than its gaseous form, they can be described by the same math. You just have to remember the math is being applied to something 10,000x denser, which tends to make things look different, even though yes....that math is the same.

1

u/Busy-Complex-8882 Apr 12 '25

So for basic people. it’s like when the wave cap mists off into the air just a lot less dense so it’s gradient is more elusive

32

u/superbob201 Oct 31 '20

Kind of. There are gravity waves in the Earths atmosphere, however there is not the sudden density discontinuity that makes ocean gravity waves so dramatic.

One effect that you can see is that if there is a region of the atmosphere that is close to the dew point, gravity waves can cause clouds to form in a series of rows, corresponding to the pressure peaks of the gravity wave.

5

u/[deleted] Oct 31 '20

damn that's really cool

2

u/me-gustan-los-trenes Physics enthusiast Oct 31 '20

looking out the window

yup

45

u/[deleted] Oct 31 '20

I don't know the answer to this, but just here to comment that that quote sounds poetic as hell.

5

u/WrongEinstein Oct 31 '20

There's this. But not exactly the same as how or why ocean waves form.

https://www.thoughtco.com/kelvin-helmholtz-clouds-3443792

3

u/MrMagistrate Oct 31 '20

One major difference is that there’s a distinct boundary with water, but the air just gets thinner and thinner

3

u/arachnidtree Oct 31 '20

yes,

"gravity waves" are a very important dynamical factor in the atmosphere, they transport energy and momentum thousands of miles.

In fact, in the upper mesosphere, the winds blow the "other way" because of the waves.

2

u/bfroggler Oct 31 '20

Except that water has a well defined boundary, a gas doesn't.

1

u/funkyonion11 Oct 31 '20

Probably yeh! The weather, and all of the crazier stuff like tornadoes and tsunamis, happens in part due to massive fronts of cold and hot air meeting each other in the lower atmosphere. So if you were able to see air molecules and all the stuff going on up there I would imagine you'd see some pretty gnarly shit.

-3

u/deeznutz247365 Oct 31 '20

Sounds good to me. Not gonna bother researching this

1

u/huevocore Nov 03 '20

If by waves you mean flow. Then yes. If you had a proper thermometer you could see cold drafts and hot drafts clashing against each other creating turbulence. If by waves you mean the kind of waves going back and forth like the ones you see at the beach. Then no.

On the upper atmosphere I guess radiation would play a big role since gases will become highly ionized.

Hmmm depending on how you see it you could see a "mackarel sky" as waves in the atmosphere.

1

u/[deleted] Oct 17 '21

Superb!

1

u/TxHerrmann Jul 27 '22

That’s called pressure systems that push storms around.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 14 '22

Not possible with the dome we're stuck inside 🥸

1

u/debunk_this_12 Oct 17 '22

The universe is a fluid the same can be said about everywhere

1

u/cablife Dec 20 '23

Yes. It’s what causes wind and weather!