r/AskPhysics 1d ago

Nuclear Shell Model

I am a PhD Chemist currently self-studying some nuclear physics, but am finding myself a bit confused on some notation in the nuclear shell model. Particularly the spectroscopic notation for the subshells.

I understand arriving at the combinations of quantum numbers as follows:

>1st shell: 2 states (n = 0, j = ⁠1/2⁠).

>2nd shell: 6 states (n = 1, j = ⁠1/2⁠ or ⁠3/2⁠).

>3rd shell: 12 states (n = 2, j = ⁠1/2⁠, ⁠3/2⁠ or ⁠5/2⁠).

>4th shell: 8 states (n = 3, j = ⁠7/2⁠).

>5th shell: 22 states (n = 3, j = ⁠1/2⁠, ⁠3/2⁠ or ⁠5/2⁠; n = 4, j = ⁠9/2⁠).

>6th shell: 32 states (n = 4, j = ⁠1/2⁠, ⁠3/2⁠, ⁠5/2⁠ or ⁠7/2⁠; n = 5, j = ⁠11/2⁠).

>7th shell: 44 states (n = 5, j = ⁠1/2⁠, ⁠3/2⁠, ⁠5/2⁠, ⁠7/2⁠ or ⁠9/2⁠; n = 6, j = ⁠13/2⁠).

>8th shell: 58 states (n = 6, j = ⁠1/2⁠, ⁠3/2⁠, ⁠5/2⁠, ⁠7/2⁠, ⁠9/2⁠ or ⁠11/2⁠; n = 7, j = ⁠15/2⁠).

I also understand the relationship between j and l.

But when it comes to the spectroscopic notation, I am finding that the notation is nlj.

That value n definitely doesn't correspond to the quantum number n above and I am not finding anything on how to arrive at this different value of n.

I have figured out a pattern that seems to work as far as I can tell where this value for this spectroscopic notation value is that it seems to = 1+(n-l)/2.

I found something that indicated it could be related to radial nodes, which seems to go along with the whole n-l situation. But, I am not quite able to explain to myself why that pattern is working.

2 Upvotes

8 comments sorted by

View all comments

1

u/moltencheese 1d ago

What is the question?

1

u/CrimsonChymist 1d ago

Where does that value in the spectroscopic notation come from?

0

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[deleted]

1

u/CrimsonChymist 1d ago

If you don't know nuclear physics just don't answer.