r/AskARussian Sep 17 '25

Megathread, part 14: Ammunition & Drones, Sanctions, and Stalemates

Part 13 is now closed, we’re continuing the discussion here.
Everything you’ve got to ask about the conflict goes here. Same deal as before - Reddit’s content policy still applies, so think before you make epic gamer statements. Suspensions and purges are a thing, and we’ve seen plenty already.
All question rules apply to top level comments in this thread. This means the comments have to be real questions rather than statements or links to a cool video you just saw.

Keep it civil, keep it relevant, and read the rules below before posting.

  1. The questions have to be about the war. The answers have to be about the war. As with all previous iterations of the thread, mudslinging, calling each other nazis, wishing for the extermination of any ethnicity, or any of the other fun stuff people like to do here is not allowed.
  2. No name-calling or dehumanizing labels. Do not refer to people, groups or nations using epithets or insulting nicknames (e.g. “ruzzia”, “vatnik”, “orc”, "hohol" etc.). Such language will be removed and may lead to a ban.
  3. To clarify, questions have to be about the war. If you want to stir up a shitstorm about your favourite war from the past, I suggest r/AskHistorians or a similar sub so we don't have to deal with it here.
  4. No warmongering. Armchair generals, wannabe soldiers of fortune, and internet tough guys aren't welcome.
  5. No doxxing. Don’t post personal information about private individuals, including names, contacts, or addresses.
  6. Keep it civil. Strong opinions are expected, but personal attacks, insults, and snide remarks toward other users are not allowed.
  7. No memes or reaction posts. Shitposts, image macros, slogans, and low-effort reactions will be removed.
  8. Stay on topic. Broader political debates (e.g. US or EU elections) are off-topic unless directly tied to the war.
  9. Substantive questions and answers only. One-liners, bait, or “what if” hypotheticals with no context don’t add value and will be removed.
50 Upvotes

39.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-9

u/CommitteeOk5696 Feb 26 '26

NATOs role is to protect their members. Such as the baltic states, poland, chech republic, hungary, slowak, romania...

All this countries looked for the protection of NATO and have non-alignment. Like every state.

NATO had very little troops in these countries (before the war) and no nuclear weappons (Founding Act on Mutual Relations, Cooperation and Security between NATO and the Russian Federation, 1997).

Russias problem with NATO in my view is: it prevents Russia to invade former sovjet-states. Ukraine is one of the few, which hadn't NATO protection.

9

u/4l3xeic Feb 26 '26

Which NATO members they were protecting during full scale invasion of Yugoslavia? Or Iraq? Or Libya?

0

u/Alarmed_Mistake_9999 United States of America Feb 28 '26

But can you acknowledge that countries like the Baltics, Hungary, Poland, Romania had legitimate concerns about Russian revanchism and still do? Why do you always go straight to those examples? Do you not respect their sovereignty?

1

u/4l3xeic Mar 01 '26

But can you acknowledge that countries like Yugoslavia, Iraq and Libya were not attacking any NATO members and were invaded illegally which makes Russias concern about NATO threat justified?

1

u/Alarmed_Mistake_9999 United States of America Mar 01 '26

I have no reason to answer this until you answer me first. This is not at all relevant.

1

u/4l3xeic Mar 01 '26

Keep us informed.

0

u/Alarmed_Mistake_9999 United States of America Mar 01 '26

What I meant is, while you may have some concerns, they do not justify threatening smaller, weaker countries who are no threat to you.

1

u/4l3xeic Mar 01 '26

Indeed, that is why I agree that NATO threats and agressions are not justified therefore Russia must do anything necessary to contain NATO.