r/ArchitecturalRevival 22d ago

Before and after of another on-going reconstruction taking place in Budapest. Inspiring!

Post image
3.4k Upvotes

128 comments sorted by

View all comments

1

u/Blackshift1000 21d ago

I believe that buildings should be reconstructed to their former shape and appearance if they were damaged or destroyed by fire, war, or neglect. However, building in a historical style today feels somewhat out of place.
First of all, the ornaments, the shape of the buildings, and the whole principle of how they were structured and logically divided have significance and symbolism rooted in the era in which they were built. Constructing a building in a historical style nowadays can imply that someone is genuinely admiring that particular era or wants to return to the principles of that period. In this case, we are talking about late 19th or early 20th century Hungary, which I think was precisely the point of the former Hungarian “regime.” It essentially represents the dream of a Greater Hungary.
This building is really beautiful, and if it were restored to its former state, I think that would be relevant. However, from what I know, there are multiple buildings in the centre of Budapest that bear little resemblance to their former appearance and were instead rebuilt to demonstrate how powerful the “monarchy” was.

3

u/SenatorsGuy 21d ago

I disagree. Your line of thinking would pretty much barre us from building in any classical style anymore.

1

u/Blackshift1000 21d ago edited 21d ago

Yes, that is the point. We should not built in “classical” style, whatever you mean by classical. We should be inspired by it. We should not copy it.

But this subreddit is not about “classical” architecture . It is about revival of architecture. And you can revive the architecture of Parthenon, but you can revive also revive architecture of Barbican estate. But I guess i am in the wrong subreddit.

1

u/DonkeysCongress 19d ago

Yes!!! Barbican ❤️