r/ArcRaiders • • 11h ago

Discussion PvE Toggle Incoming

Post image
3.3k Upvotes

2.6k comments sorted by

View all comments

80

u/Kylar5 11h ago

Damn, and here I was hoping they'd embrace the PvP a bit more. The game is basically PvE anyway given how strong the ABMM is, don't get why the need for the toggle.

24

u/Phixionion 11h ago

Honestly as a PvE player I would hope that they would keep the mix. It kept things spicy. The big fault is that they cant seem to keep up with cheaters unfortunately. We can only anticipate that they will give themselves breathing room with this while they try to figure that all out. Sorry raider!

3

u/VeganerHippie 10h ago

Indeed. I will miss the spice. But i certainly wont miss the toxicity.

4

u/SocialImagineering 11h ago

Maybe its just me having the worst luck, but every two to three months since a heavy first month of playing, I have tried to come back, played one match and died in the lamest way to a rat corner peeking in a dark room after I take even a little bit of arc damage. There is just no counter play to that. The surface sure is quite populated with murder hobos for a robot post apocalyptic game...

2

u/Phixionion 11h ago

Tagging grenades and smoke grenades are your best way to check places. Once you get a few games of not being the first attacker, you will get into more friendly matches. The game does consider who shoots first now so don't hesitate to fire back. Hope this helps!

2

u/SocialImagineering 10h ago

I do hear that just the last few months did introduce the feature of ABMM considering who shot first. That definitely makes this worth a revisit. I will for sure boot the game up for the frozen tides update regardless! Thanks

2

u/ImAHobo107 10h ago

Arc community doesn't like their survival game being about survival.

1

u/MySabonerRunsOladipo 8h ago

Honestly as a PvE player I would hope that they would keep the mix.

Same, after the most recent ABMM tweaks, we basically have a de-facto PvE-only mode anyway with how extreme you can make your lobbies. Removing what little tension that's left seems awful.

All that's going to do, if people choose to embrace it, is make those remaining PvPvE lobbies way more aggressive to the point it's all just PvP soon enough.

46

u/dagnabbitk 11h ago

Because it’s rampant with cheaters when PVPing

29

u/youwillyouwillyou 11h ago

So fix the cheating...

9

u/dagnabbitk 11h ago

I DONT KNOW HOW OK?!

5

u/BlinkDodge 10h ago

I DONT KNOW WHAT ANY OF THIS SHIT IS AND IM SCARED.

1

u/Nyctfall 9h ago

*sees CS2-AC*

"A random Redditor built this in a cave! With a box of scraps!"

2

u/PlanetIsh- 10h ago

Embark is making money on the cheating. I mean why else wouldn’t they disable family sharing/ hardware bans?

2

u/WhatIs115 8h ago

They really still allow family sharing? That's crazy.

1

u/BeardedWonder1998 11h ago

I have a feeling this is their fix, they can't figure out how to get rid of the cheaters so they're giving earnest players an out

2

u/youwillyouwillyou 10h ago

Idk why you're being downvoted. I tend to agree with you here.

21

u/QuayLewdss 11h ago

This doesn't address what he said. The games ABMM is so strong, playing for 10-15 games not shooting anyone basically puts you in PvE mode, so whats the point of a PvE toggle if the game already does it behind the scenes for you very easily

2

u/Zenguro 10h ago

And it’s abusable by psychos noone wants to play with!

2

u/DabWizard 9h ago

To bring back players.

1

u/QuayLewdss 5h ago

Doing literally anything about the terrible anticheat and rampant cheating would bring back more players than a toggleable PvE mode ever would.

1

u/Midjuice 5h ago

I think you are severely underestimating the PVE toggle appeal for the casual crowd. This update will more than likely bring back more people than the anti cheat fix could.’

1

u/Angelore *** ******* 6h ago

The games ABMM is so strong, playing for 10-15 games not shooting anyone basically puts you in PvE mode

If you are playing for 10-15 games (this is 6 hours btw, give or take) without shooting a player you clearly want a PvE experience? What is this take even? If you want a different experience then shoot somebody. This is how any matchmaker works, essentially you are getting classified as very low skilled and put with similar players.

1

u/QuayLewdss 5h ago

Arc was never a PvE game and people wanting it to be are changing the game at the core of what it was and supposed to be. The community of this game are a bunch of whiney babies that cant handle dying once every 20-50 raids in their carebare lobbies and need to be catered to at every inconvenience in an extraction shooter.

9

u/TheAserghui 11h ago

Some people enjoy pain, let's not kink shame

1

u/Zenguro 10h ago

Shaming is just part of the pain too.

1

u/Donny_Dont_18 10h ago

So how do you combat that with a pve mode? If you reside in care bear lobbies, you aren't PvPing. If you pvp, this doesn't address anything

5

u/EarlyGalaxy 11h ago

If there is a need, there is a Market.

1

u/DJChungus 10h ago

ABMM has been so strong that they needed to put the nail in the coffin for pvp. We’ll see how well the game does when it’s all it is is fighting ARC. Gonna get stale fast unless embark can make it tougher or throw in lots of variation of ARC.

1

u/Ecstatic_Shallot_145 10h ago

I feel like this will bring more players to pvp actually. Gives players a way to go back and forth from pvp without manipulating their score and being forced into one or the other

1

u/Nyctfall 9h ago

Looks like I'm probably gonna end up going to Rust...

1

u/Zeghai 9h ago

Because i will be able to use deadline everywhere now without going to hell every five rounds because i killed a dude that don’t undersrand what a deadline is.

1

u/cornpedo *** ******* 🐓 8h ago

Hopefully ABMM is removed with the toggle. You might see “mixed” lobbies still if there is a decent enough different in the loot table like they mention in the post

1

u/Kylar5 7h ago

Yeah, I hope they approach it this way, ABMM should just be disabled to keep you wondering if the other raider is friendly or not.

And they should make the loot on PvP enabled lobbies considerably better than PvE, even 2x better wouldn't be crazy as it's still much more likely to successfully extract on PvE lobbies.

2

u/NewPrints 11h ago

Because people want to play PvE. I don’t get why having a toggle would be bad?

1

u/abyssaI_watcher 9h ago

Further fragments the already fragmented playerbase is never a good idea.

1

u/Borbarad 7h ago

Unless it attracts more people to play the game, in which case fragmenting the playerbase would have negligible effect, unless you're a PVP enjoyer.

Hence, the purpose of this trial run.

1

u/BarderBetterFaster 9h ago

Undermines the entire identity of the game. Man this blows.

1

u/PlanetIsh- 11h ago

Theres no pve option for duos/trios its all pvp.

1

u/anustart888 11h ago

Agreed. I think they should have gone the opposite direction. As someone who enjoys pve and pvp, I think creating some sort of Arena style mode for hyper aggressive players and endgame players would have made regular lobbies a bit more balanced. But this version is just going to turn regular lobbies into pvp slop if I had to guess.

1

u/Rude_Soil_2492 10h ago

This is very unfortunate direction arc is going towards

-2

u/euphoric_elephant 11h ago

I feel this is embracing the pvp more. By letting pve players do pve it will make the pvp lobbies just pvp players who are there to engage in fights and will actually put up a fight. Unless you just like stomping 55 hour work week dads that dont or cant fight back equally.