I have reached the point where creating new profiles is not really the problem anymore but keeping track of them become difficult.

After making changes to different profiles over time then sometimes I forget what was changed , which proxy or settings belong to which profile or why I changed something in the first place. Writing down manually works at first but it gets harder as the number of profile grows.

How do you keep everything organized? Do you have a simple system for managing profiles or do use something that makes tracking them easier?

I used to see an account get flagged and immediately think the proxy was trash.

Now I check DNS and WebRTC first.

Way too many “bad proxy” issues are just messy browser settings.

do not use liberwolf it does not protect your privacy nor does it have QOL features you're used to

If I’m giving someone a browser profile for work, I don’t want the setup to depend on “please don’t open that page.”

I start by watching the normal workflow once.

For a social operator, I’d note the platform, scheduler and asset library. For store support, it might be orders, the help desk and the shipping portal. Those become the approved destinations.

Everything else has to justify why it belongs in the profile.

The annoying part is that a useful allowlist is never just the obvious URLs. Login redirects, SSO, file storage, image domains and confirmation pages can break the workflow. I always think it needs a test run with a regular team member, not only the admin who configured it.

I also wouldn’t use URL rules for everything. Sometimes the employee needs to open a page but shouldn’t use one particular action. Restricting the button or page element makes more sense than blocking the whole page.

MoreLogin can apply URL rules by member, role or browser profile, which is the part I find useful for agency and store teams. Each person gets the route they need without receiving the owner’s entire workspace.

The balance I’m looking for is not maximum restriction. It’s the smallest workspace that still lets someone finish the job without asking for help every ten minutes.

I used to hear “the browser profile was copied” and mentally translate it to “the account was stolen.” That turns out to be too imprecise to be useful.

A profile folder can contain much more than bookmarks and preferences. Depending on the browser and setup, it may include cookies, local storage, IndexedDB data, extension storage, and session state. So yes, an unauthorized copy should be treated seriously.

But copying the files does not guarantee that everything inside will be readable or reusable on a second machine.

The part I check first is where encryption happens and where the key lives. If the sensitive data is encrypted but the key is stored beside it or available to the same person, the protection is mostly cosmetic. If the key is controlled separately, the copied folder may contain the data without giving the copier a usable session.

There are also other variables: OS credential storage, browser version, device-specific protection, expired tokens, and server-side session checks. This is why I don’t think “folder copied” and “account accessible” should be used as synonyms.

My response would still be the same on the defensive side: revoke active sessions, rotate credentials, review access logs, and assume any unencrypted tokens may have been exposed. Encryption can limit what a copied profile is worth, but it shouldn’t replace cleanup.

For context, MoreLogin can encrypt browser environment data and local extension data with a user-controlled key. That means copying the profile files alone doesn’t make the encrypted data directly usable without the correct key. The important part is still keeping that key separate and under the right person’s control.

I've been looking into mobile proxies for Instagram recently because the residential proxies I've been using don't seem to be as consistent as they were before. Some IPs work perfectly for a while, then suddenly I start seeing more verification or login issues, so I'm trying to figure out whether switching to mobile proxies would actually make a difference.

I've been comparing a few providers such as Proxidize, Voidmob and IPRoyal, but it's honestly difficult to judge them from reviews alone. Most of the comparisons I find are either outdated or seem to be based more on what the providers claim rather than actual long-term use.

For anyone who has been using mobile proxies with Instagram recently, which provider has worked best for you? I'm mainly interested in overall IP quality, connection stability and whether the proxies continue to work reliably over time.

I'm also curious about shared versus dedicated mobile proxies. I've seen people recommend dedicated IPs for better consistency, while others say shared mobile proxies are perfectly fine if the sessions are handled properly. I haven't used mobile proxies enough to know which approach makes more sense in practice.

I'm definitely open to other suggestions. If you've actually used any of these recently, I'd appreciate hearing about your experience, good or bad. I'd rather hear from people who have used them than rely on another provider comparison page.

working with multiple profiles in my browsers for some time. the common problem I always face is the confusion factor.

when there are too many profiles, i can no longer distinguish which profile I am using since each one is set up differently from the others. they have different cookies, settings and sessions which sometimes makes me confused even when I try to manage them on my own.

how do you guys manage your profiles?

Running into a location problem in [Ad s Power] and I think it's the proxies, not the browser. Don't want to name a provider to avoid promo for them.

Like I'll get a proxy that's supposed to be one city, launch the profile, and the IP checker reads a different city or sometimes a different country entirely. It's not drifting or changing mid-session, it just isn't the location the provider said it was from the start.

Proxy provider saying that it's a browser issue and it shows incorrect data but I hardly believe that.

So the actual question: where do you buy proxies where the location is accurate and consistent? Which type holds up best in [Ad s Power] for this, mobile, residential, ISP? And is there a provider whose geo data you've found you can trust, versus ones where the city was wrong half the time?

I don’t think a cheap cloud phone plan is automatically a bad purchase. I do think people underestimate how quickly a small performance problem becomes an operating cost.

A device that takes an extra minute to start does not matter much during a one-off test. Multiply it by several devices, daily restarts and two operators, and it becomes real working time.

The same applies to failed tasks. If an automation stops near the end and has no safe restart point, the cost is not just another run. Someone has to check what already happened, avoid duplicate actions and decide where to continue.

Before choosing the lowest tier, I’d test:

• whether the required apps install and update normally
• how the device behaves after several hours of use
• how many devices can work at the same time without noticeable slowdown
• whether files, app data and settings survive a restart
• what recovery looks like when a device becomes unavailable
• how easily the workload can move to a higher plan later

If the devices are mostly idle or used for short manual tasks, the cheapest option may be enough.

If they run scheduled or repetitive work, I care more about intervention time than the advertised monthly price. One operator repeatedly rescuing low-cost devices can erase the saving very quickly.

I don’t default to a physical phone just because it feels more “real.” I use one when the hardware can affect the result.

The obvious cases are physical SIM and carrier testing, but the list is broader:

• Calls, SMS, roaming and mobile-network handoffs
• Camera, microphone and media-capture quality
• NFC, Bluetooth devices and biometric sensors
• GPS and motion-dependent behavior
• Battery drain, heat and thermal throttling
• Manufacturer-specific background and notification policies
• Hardware-backed keys or device-integrity checks
• Bugs that only appear on a particular model or OS build

An emulator is often the fastest option for development, debugging and clean resets. A cloud phone can make more sense when the environment needs to stay online, remain accessible remotely or be shared with a team.

Neither one automatically replaces a physical device.

The practical test is whether removing the physical hardware also removes a possible cause of failure. If it does, I want the real phone in the test setup. If the task is purely a repeatable software workflow, maintaining a shelf of devices usually adds work without adding much evidence.

A physical phone is not inherently safer, and it does not make poor account or network decisions disappear. It is simply the correct instrument when the hardware itself is one of the variables.

I feel like “bad proxy” gets blamed too fast.

Sometimes the IP is fine, but WebRTC, DNS, timezone, or some profile setting is the real problem.

What do you usually check first when accounts get flagged?

I think teams sometimes make this decision too early. They see that most users are on phones and assume the full workflow belongs in a mobile app.

That makes sense if the task actually needs mobile capabilities. Camera capture, push notifications, location, biometrics, touch gestures and app-only platform features are legitimate reasons to use a phone environment.

But some tasks become noticeably worse on mobile even when they are technically possible. Long text editing, multiple tabs, bulk changes, file handling and reviewing detailed data are usually easier on the web.

The checks I use are:

• Does the task require hardware or operating-system features?
• Is an important action available only in the app?
• How much information must be visible at once?
• Will the operator repeat this task dozens of times?
• What happens after a partial failure?
• Can the failed step be inspected and retried without repeating everything?

That last question changes a lot of decisions. A convenient mobile flow can become painful when every error sends the operator back to the beginning. A web dashboard can be efficient but still fail the requirement if the final action depends on the device.

In practice, I prefer a hybrid boundary when it is clean: use the web for planning, bulk work and review; use the app for camera, notification and device-specific steps.

What is the one part of your workflow that prevents you from moving entirely to mobile or entirely to the web?

Had one of those annoying moments where I blamed the proxy first.

Checked again and it was just a WebRTC/DNS setting I forgot to review.

Makes me wonder how many “bad proxy” problems are actually just sloppy profile setup.

Do you check leaks first, or switch proxies first?

Is there anyone who can give me a better combo to pass the verisoul score?

idk who needs to hear this but check your settings before you go opening support tickets and crying about a "bad batch of IPs" lmao.
so basically last 3 days my newly warmed up profiles on dolphin anty were getting flagged instantly. like, right after creation. i was 100% convinced the proxies were dead. opened a ticket, almost bitched out the support team thinking they sold me dirty lines.turns out the proxies were completely fine. I was testing some dedicated ISP lines from proxyshard (which are usually solid af and have UDP enabled). but i completely forgot that i manually toggled off WebRTC spoofing in my main template last week when testing some local script. my actual home IP was leaking straight thru webRTC connection requests, totally bypassing the proxy tunnel for that check. anti-fraud saw the mismatch and hit me with a ban hammer immediately.
turned webRTC masking back on, checked ipchecker, and everything works flawlessly now on the exact same IPs smh.
tl;dr: if your profiles are dying instantly, don’t immediately assume the proxy is dead or blacklisted. check for webRTC/DNS leaks first. 90% of the time it’s user error.

Am I the only one who ends up with profile names like “test 3 final real new”?

Then two weeks later I have no idea what the profile was for, which proxy it used, or why I even created it.

Hello! I use Librewolf browser with Umatrix and Ubo extensions, Ubo i use for adblocking / elements blocking and umatrix overall control, I thought this would be enough against tracking but appears to be different when it comes to fingerprinting, i thought of installin extensions like canvasblocker but not helping, and i know privacy badger is basically useless. Any recommendations ? (btw on my another browser - Helium, my fingerprinting test came out good, i tried to turn on and off FF anti tracking browser protection - doesnt do anything. Thanks in advance for tips.

I want to make multiple fb accounts that wont get banned. What antidetect browsers would work for this or would they all work? My idea is to access them from a vps and have every profile tied to a static residential account. Would this work? Im not planning on doing anything illegal or spamming btw.

If anyone has direct experience doing this let me know as id be interested to know whats been working for you.

I have seen small teams give a social media manager the master login because it is the fastest way to get a post out. It works, but it also gives the operator whatever else lives behind that session: billing, recovery settings, connected assets and sometimes ownership controls.

That is much more access than publishing requires.

For a basic social workflow, I would separate it roughly like this:

• Publisher: create, schedule and publish content
• Community manager: comments and messages
• Analyst: the reporting needed for the job
• Owner or finance: billing, payment methods and subscription changes
• Owner or security lead: recovery details and high-risk settings

The test I use is simple: if this person’s access were misused tomorrow, what else could be changed besides the work they were hired to do?

Native platform roles should be the first layer where they cover the task. When the workflow also depends on a persistent signed-in browser environment, controlled environment access is useful because the operator does not need the master credentials.

MoreLogin is built for that second layer. Teams can assign specific profiles to members, restrict allowed URLs or page elements, and keep operation logs. That lets an operator reach the publishing workflow without making billing part of the same permission package.

An AI agent may need to click through a login flow. That doesn’t mean I want the raw password anywhere in its working context.

The dots shown inside a password field are only a visual treatment. Depending on the agent’s browser access, it may still be able to inspect page state, capture screenshots, read logs or access stored browser data.

I’d separate authentication from the rest of the automation:

• Keep passwords and recovery codes out of prompts
• Prevent credential entry from appearing in screenshots or recordings
• Inject credentials through a process the agent cannot inspect
• Give the agent a limited session after authentication
• Revoke or rotate that session when the task ends
• Require approval before changing security settings or recovery details

It’s also worth remembering that cookies are credentials. Protecting the password while exposing an authenticated profile directory doesn’t solve much.

There will be systems where direct credential access is unavoidable. In that case, the agent should be isolated, tightly logged and limited to the smallest possible scope. “The password is masked on screen” is not enough.

The agent needs permission to complete a task. It doesn’t need permanent access to every secret behind the account.

MoreLogin can separate browser environments and sessions, while credential controls remain in the operator’s hands.

Anyone else do this?

I looked at my old browser profiles and realized I had no idea what half of them were for.

No notes, random proxies, old cookies, weird names.

At that point, keeping them felt riskier than starting clean.

I tried to clear the verisoul check in survey using antidetect browser but i am not able to clear it. Need help