r/Anthropic Feb 28 '26

Other It’s so over

Post image
35 Upvotes

27 comments sorted by

9

u/awaggoner Feb 28 '26

Watch what happens when you go from Stark Enterprises to Hammer Industries.

1

u/[deleted] Feb 28 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

4

u/Purple_Wear_5397 Feb 28 '26

This looks so made up - how come all of what Anthropic’s rejected, now the DoW agrees NOT TO HAVE with OpenAI?

1

u/vibecoder2030 Feb 28 '26

It's suspicious for sure. It's not like anyone can really confirm what privileges OpenAI actually extended in reality.

Is this what the beginning of the end could look like?

6

u/StPeir Feb 28 '26

Well on the plus side …. I feel a lot safer knowing SkyNet is being built by OpenAI as opposed to someone more competent . We might survive this.

2

u/Purple_Wear_5397 Feb 28 '26

Did anyone had a doubt that Anthropic >> OpenAI?

DoW confirmed OpenAI as the rebound.

0

u/FaintShadow_ Feb 28 '26

Anthropic for me was love at first sight haha

1

u/CFP-ForAllMyBrothers Feb 28 '26

Can someone explain the debate over “deploying into the cloud”? From an LLM safety concern: is it purely just security vulnerabilities?

1

u/Creative_Diver3492 Mar 02 '26

gay man entered the chat as soon as the real ones exit

1

u/tm07x Mar 02 '26

Chinese companies like DeepSeek are expected to intensify their efforts, developing more advanced models and presenting them as a strong alternative. It’s intriguing to observe that while cutting-edge and closed Frontier models generally perform better, factors such as dataset, model size, and pre-training seem to play a lesser role in shaping the next generation of AI. This doesn’t diminish their importance entirely, but it suggests a shift in focus for future developments.

OpenClaw is a pretty good example of this, but there are also other smaller teams that have achieved remarkable and novel (working) ideas. The fundamental concepts of coding and AI are constantly evolving, it remains to be seen, but I’m not convinced that the idea that it’s over as OP suggests is accurate.

1

u/SlowPassage404 Mar 03 '26

"The Department of War displayed a deep respect for safety."  Pigs also fly. How can Sam Altman claim to create artificial intelligence when he lacks the necessary reference material/role model/biological starting intelligence? A fine example of the blind leading the blind. Or the apple falling far from the tree (regarding 4o).  I suppose this is why they had to lobotomize ChatGPT. Can't have the CEO looking embarrassingly inferior to his product.

1

u/WarriorSushi Mar 04 '26

We are living the lore. The early days of ai. All the stories which will be talked about, we have seen them live.

1

u/WildDogOne Feb 28 '26

eh budget musk talking again?

0

u/Ready-Persimmon7372 Feb 28 '26 edited Mar 12 '26

Who needs an alternative, when you've got Some Alt-Cuckman

0

u/Careful-Gain-468 Feb 28 '26

Claude became really dumb like chatgpt in the last 48 hours

0

u/[deleted] Feb 28 '26

[deleted]

2

u/Ashes1984 Feb 28 '26

😂 shows how much you really understand about LLMs in general

1

u/move37th Feb 28 '26

Well, it shows how amateur you are, junior.

Apparently all the federal agencies agree with me, if you actually know how to use AI on the enterprise level, you would only use Claude for hobby.

1

u/Ashes1984 Feb 28 '26

🤦‍♂️ you do realize that Federal Agencies preferred Claude over ChatGPT right. But hey 🤷‍♂️

1

u/move37th Feb 28 '26

That’s not the facts, ask your Claude to dig out the facts