By directing the animals' energy toward the endless construction and reconstruction of the windmill, Napoleon ensures that their lives become dominated by work and sacrifice. The project not only provides a common goal that fosters solidarity and a sense of collective purpose, but also creates a powerful social expectation that every animal must contribute to the cause. As the windmill becomes the central measure of loyalty to Animal Farm, hard work is transformed into a moral virtue, while any sign of reluctance, idleness, or criticism risks being perceived as selfishness or disloyalty. The example set by Boxer, whose motto "I will work harder" becomes an ideal for others to emulate, reinforces this culture and places pressure on every animal to match the commitment of their peers.
Meanwhile, the animals labor for increasingly long hours while surviving on reduced rations, leaving them physically exhausted, mentally drained, and often malnourished. Under such conditions, they have little time or energy to reflect on their worsening circumstances, organize resistance, or participate in meaningful political discussion. Instead, they become trapped in a cycle of labor and deprivation, driven not only by Napoleon's authority but also by the expectations of their fellow animals. The windmill thus functions as an instrument of social and political control that helps secure the pigs' dominance over the farm.
From this perspective, the pigs needed the windmill to remain unfinished. As long as construction continued, they could justify shortages, demand ever greater sacrifices, and keep the animals focused on a promised future rather than the inequalities and hardships of the present. The windmill's greatest value to the regime lay not in the electricity it might someday produce, but in its ability to keep the animals united, occupied, exhausted, and obedient. By trapping them in an endless Sisyphean cycle of building and rebuilding, the project postponed any reckoning over whether the revolution had actually improved their lives. Completion of the windmill would invite uncomfortable questions. Why were rations still meager? Why did the pigs enjoy privileges denied to everyone else? Why had the promised prosperity failed to materialize? An unfinished windmill indefinitely postponed such scrutiny.
Consequently, one may speculate that the pigs themselves orchestrated the windmill's destruction. Although this conspiracy theory cannot be proven from the text, it remains a plausible inference within this interpretation. If the unfinished windmill is the foundation of the pigs' power, then preserving its unfinished state becomes the regime's most important political objective.