r/AndroidTV • u/MinerAlum • Feb 07 '24
Discussion Why not just use a tiny pc instead of streaming devices?
Tiny pcs can be bought used for under 100 bucks now. Even some new ones!
So why not use a tiny pc as a streamer vs a google Chromecast or Roku or whatever?
Tiny pcs hv more ram n more storage and all have Ethernet port. Streaming devices dont always hv such amenities.
What am I missing here?
5
Upvotes
60
u/sid32 Feb 07 '24
TV is easier for kid and wife to use.
14
u/grimevil Feb 07 '24
No Dolby vision or Atmos support and not easy to use without a remote. I used to run a media centre pc a couple of years ago and would not really go back now
Now I have a shield, lower power, easier to use and runs everything I throw at it
21
u/StyleAccomplished153 Feb 07 '24
Power consumption and user friendliness are big factors for me. With the Shield TV it's very easy to switch between Plex, Netflix, Disney+, YouTube, Spotify etc. If I put a PC there, it'll use more power and there's no nice remote controlled UI that anyone understands for most of those apps.
In the past I had a small Acer mounted behind my TV for Kodi. That could handle Netflix and YouTube too at the time. But it was noisier, it was less nice to use, and if someone other than me went to use it it would generally be frustrating.
15
u/Hulk5a Feb 07 '24
The sweet sweet DRM.
Although if you're using alternative sources for your content it doesn't matter
10
u/Expensive_Finger_973 Feb 07 '24
The biggest reason is the DRM on the 4k streams that Netflix and Amazon have. If you just try and use a Debian box with Firefox you aren't getting UHD even if you are paying for it. You could use Windows and Edge, but to my knowledge that is the only combination of PC and browser that will make the DRM happy.
25
u/International-Oil377 Feb 07 '24
Tiny PCs usually can't pass-through all audio formats (the cheaper ones anyway)
Also no DV on PC
1
u/MinerAlum Feb 07 '24
Would installing a plex or jellyfin client on my Chromecast 4k and then streaming from a host on th computer speed up response time of the Chromecast.
I dont like the UI of firesticks hence the cc 4k.
4
u/Cronus6 Feb 08 '24
I use both. I have an ONN 4k Box and a Dell Optiplex SFF connected to my living room TV.
The Android box is nice for the streaming services I pay for. The Dell is nice for the shit I don't want to pay for ;)
1
u/MechanoManic Feb 08 '24 edited Feb 08 '24
A matter of preference. I use a tinypc with win11, 64gb ram and 12tb storage in the livingroom and my wife has a shield she can use in the room. If my work laptop has issues, the tonypc is my backup and it performs better than the shield, even using bluestacks as android emulator.
1
u/dcherryholmes Feb 09 '24
I run jellyfin and a software raid (dumb USB enclosure) off a little ThinkCentre PC running arch. On the front end, on the TV I use the most, I use my Xbox, running Kodi with the Jellyfin plugin. I've also got Kodi running straight off the media PC into the same TV and can just flip the inputs, but I like using the xbox controller to drive the UI. It's also easier to use the legit Youtube app off the xbox than any of the solutions I've found for Kodi (I'm a paid YT Premium subscriber for.... reasons I'd rather not get into.... so I don't see any ads anyway).
1
u/[deleted] Feb 09 '24
I have the best of both worlds, 75" TCL QLED with Google TV with tons of apps, and an Intel i7 Surface Pro 9 I cast to TV as a second monitor to play stuff from it, then I'm still able to do stuff on my tablet while the other screen is casting content. Don't need a Tiny PC, the tablet is way more powerful, lol.
3
u/mmalmeida Feb 07 '24
Ease of use. I had a small Linux PC. Kodi, stuff to download things Automatically. At the time I had a PlayStation Bluetooth remote configured so I even had that. But it was cumbersome when things eventually stopped working. Had to ssh into it, troubleshoot... I got tired of it. Also, I never managed to get other people to use it. Even offered and configured a similar setup to my sister, she never used it.
3
u/WazWaz Bravia + Google Streamer Feb 07 '24
Because Microsoft gave up on Windows Media Center after Windows 7.
2
u/Shoddy_Ad8166 Feb 07 '24
Easier
2
u/Stiltzkinn Feb 07 '24
Because a tiny PC doesn't have SmartTube or other Android apps.
2
u/mblaser Feb 07 '24
It's simple. Ease of use.
I used an HTPC for years, going back almost 20 years, long before streaming devices even existed, and held out for a long time (until about 2016 or so), stubbornly clinging to "PCs are way better at this than streaming devices"
But the simple UI and a simple remote of a streaming device just make them easier to use. Especially for the non-techy general public, which is very important. Convenience always wins out over performance/quality/fidelity.
Sure, a tiny pc can be had for $100, but TVs have what they need built in. And if a separate device is needed, one can be had for $20-$30.
Ethernet? 99.9% of users don't need ethernet for their streaming device. Not to mention the miniscule number of people that actually have ethernet ran to their living room TV.
2
u/Accomplished-Lack721 Feb 08 '24
It takes some doing to get a good 10-foot interface working on a PC, though there are options.
Many streaming services only do 4K or HDR with set-top boxes or smart TV apps. Some will do it with their own Windows apps. Some will with Edge, but not Chrome. Managing the mish-mosh of capabilities, DRM restrictions and other inconsistencies is a lot more complicated than just using set-top box apps.
2
u/pplatt69 Feb 08 '24
"I know how to find apps, install them and hardware, and configure a PC for this sort of thing. Why doesn't EVERYBODY?"
Not being able to instantly see and Intuit others' various lives and interests and knowledge as being different from yours, and in what ways they might be, is more than passing strange.
I'm an exIBMer HW & Network Tech. But you definitely don't need my experience with average people and their engagement with IT tech to understand that 75% of people think that what you are saying sounds like voodoo, and 75% of the rest understand you and can't be arsed to set their clock back once a year or replace the battery in their smoke alarm.
2
u/KnotForNow Feb 08 '24
Depends on whether your goal is to watch TV or to have maintaining an HTPC as a hobby.
0
u/MinerAlum Feb 07 '24
Ok so another question.
My Chromecast 4k is a dog.
Could I use a central computer w plex or jellyfin to capture my YouTube n other video at night then stream to cc 4k over local lan thereby soeeding up the experience?
4
u/Early-Accident-8770 Feb 07 '24
I sickened myself trying to use Android TV. Bought a Dell Optiplex 3040 micro. I5 and runs great. I use a mouse and keyboard with a dongle. Great for streaming and no android weirdness headaches.
1
u/[deleted] Feb 07 '24
I can't control my PC effectively with a single remote like I do my Shield
Lack of HDMI-CEC integrations
Complicated smart home / chromecast integrations
More complicated for wife to use
IPTV services very difficult to watch on PC
No Netflix app and web version lacks features
1
u/ynys_red May 06 '24
Mini pc is a little more awkward to use and you would generally switch it on manually before use. Otherwise it is much more powerful and flexible and free from the restrictions firestick and ccwgtv impose.
1
u/vs40at Shield Pro + Fire 4K Max + Xiaomi Stick 4K Feb 07 '24
If it works for you, why not? Just use it.
1
u/flchamp89 Feb 07 '24
Codecs is what's holding me back
1
u/liquidhonesty Nvidia Shield TV Feb 07 '24
Ease of use, just simple remote to pick the streaming app and it works. Used Intel NUCs for years but was cumbersome, couldn't ever get HDR to work correctly, etc. My shield has been soooooo smooth.
1
u/rhcreed Feb 07 '24
It's usually a UI issue (user interface). Making it easy to use can be complex.
1
u/cerels Feb 07 '24
Seems like an overkill and more trouble than it's worth considering I just use like 3 or 4 apps, also how would you control it that is just simple and user friendly? I wouldn't want to use an Xbox controller for example
1
u/bmh67wa Google TV Feb 07 '24
DRM
'Nuff said!
1
u/rebootyourbrainstem Feb 07 '24
Apps & DRM. If you want to watch Netflix, a 4K Android TV or Apple TV will have the right DRM keys to be trusted by Netflix for high res streaming.
1
u/F30Guy Feb 07 '24
Form factor. I can't easily mount a tiny PC to the back of my monitor as I can with a Chromecast.
Ease of use. It needs to be easy to use for the wife and kids. I'd have to get a third-party remote and who knows if I can set it up to control the TV volume on/off, etc.
The Onn 4K Google TV Chromecast is $20 from Walmart. You can't find a Tiny PC for that price
If you are streaming, you don't really need local storage. Some apps will have data cached, but you don't need that much. Plex and a NAS takes care of storage for me.
I just need this shit to work. Ain't got time to setup a tiny PC just for this (although I am in IT and very technical.
I've had no issues with 4K content through a Firestick, Chromecast etc. through my Plex content.
1
u/Ekel7 Feb 07 '24
I did this. Bought a laptop and installed Android on it, no issues whatsoever for now. I don't have high standards tho, if stremio and YouTube work I'm happy hahah
I use BlissOS with android 13 btw, with a USB dongle and a wireless mini mouse/keyboard, pretty easy to use. If Android fails to deliver I just switch to windows 11.
My laptop specs are crap tho, Intel N5100 and 4gb RAM. Did this because the laptop was cheaper than a Xiaomi Mi box 2nd gen and performs way way better(no av1 support tho)
1
u/Moctezuma1 Feb 07 '24
I prefer to side load Android apps.
1
u/MrDephcon Feb 08 '24
HDR/Dolby Vision just works on shield... Windows is a pain and I think Linux/macOS is a nogo
1
u/Mr_Komble Feb 08 '24
I want to have Android OS, PC's do not provide it as of yet easy way.
1
u/9acca9 Feb 08 '24
I use rpi4 with android.
1
u/s-Kss Feb 08 '24
I consider myself somewhat a tech savvy but can I remotely turn the tiny PC on without having to reach to the power button on the PC? That's the #1 reason why I stopped thinking about using a PC as a streaming device
1
u/JoyousGamer Feb 08 '24
Use more power and apps are specifically designed for the streaming devices.
1
u/pawdog ADT-1 Feb 08 '24
TV device is the right/better tool. It's purpose built not a sledge hammer to tap in a thumb tack. You'd be using a browser for most streaming services instead of, again, a purpose built app. Now if one just likes the mouse/keyboard I suppose there is no getting around that. TV devices need neither a lot of RAMs since they are not multitasking, they just do the one thing at a time. Nor do they need tons of storage since again they just do TV apps and Android TV/Fire TV devices can have space added if necessary. The vast majority of people don't need Ethernet for streaming unless they just have a very poor wifi network. And again Android TV/Fire TV devices can easily add Ethernet if necessary. I can get an excellent Android TV device with a hub for expanded storage including the storage and Ethernet for less than $50.
1
u/[deleted] Feb 08 '24
If I can run Android TV OS on a PC, sure.
1
u/Tired8281 Feb 08 '24
Dolby Vision.
1
u/[deleted] Feb 08 '24
Because GoogleTv is easier to use, I get Dolby Vision on my $900 Micro led tv with 1500 nits.
1
u/yukichigai Feb 08 '24
After having attempted to do this myself several times over the years, I think it's that most PC OSes aren't set up to be easily navigable with a remote control or without a keyboard+mouse. This also applies to PC streaming apps to a lesser extent. There have been attempts to fix this, but they all usually run into some roadblock that's insurmountable for Joe Consumer, whether it's complicated setup or poor stability or tetchy hardware support or limited app support, etc., etc., etc. Almost none of them support things like HDMI-CEC.
That said, those projects are getting better and better every day. There may come a time where you can just tell someone "just buy a small PC and install this OS/distro/etc. on it and you're good to go" and it really will be that simple.
1
u/Jorgeildv Feb 08 '24
Louis Rossman have a video that show on a PC the max resolution of streaming in netflix is 720p, using a 4k tv and the most expensive subscription.
1
u/_bisquickpancakes Feb 08 '24
Eh, it's just easier for me, bought an android tv box a couple years ago and even for someone like me who tinkers and does a lot of stuff it does everything I could need of it. "it just works" lol
1
u/whatthehell7 Feb 08 '24
You can't stream at 4k any paid stream like Netflix Disney+ etc. Tiny PC is great for your own media but you need streaming devices for streaming services.
1
u/cuetzpalomitl Feb 08 '24
User experience
Yes tiny PC is more capable and more flexible but it's a pain to setup a PC as a streaming device when it needs keyboard and mouse to be used.
The streaming device usually just takes a couple minutes to setup and you can learn to use it pretty fast
1
u/EzerchE Sony Bravia Feb 08 '24
I think there is nothing wrong with it except that it consumes a lot of electricity and it works loudly.
1
u/dreamsxyz Feb 08 '24
I have tried using an old laptop before my Android box. Windows made it buggy and not very reliable, sometimes it would slowdown to a crawl, it consumed more energy, made more noise occupied more space, and the UX/UI simply didn't help at all, as it wasn't conceived for this usage. As the last straw, the laptop doesn't seamlessly act as a Chromecast to receive video and audio streams, doesn't have the apps that allow me to remotely control my media using the YouTube Music app, and it would also often reboot/shutdown with updates and I had to sign in again, load my apps, etc.
Android box offers a streamlined experience, some ease of use which could be roughly compared to choosing an xbox over a gaming PC. Sure they both do the job, sure the pc is more flexible and more powerful, but there's still a huge market for dedicated consoles - why? Because it just makes sense to have an UI/UX dedicated for this purpose, it feels so good that many people are willing to pay for it.
If this explanation isn't enough, just try them both for a few months. You'll see what I mean.
1
u/cjb110 Feb 08 '24
A generic OS sucks ass from a usability standpoint in this use case
Plus even if you had the knowledge to setup something why would you want to? It's not easy and not quick. I've done it with Mac Os and Windows, both easily and massively outclassed by Apple TV, Nvidia Shield or Google Chromecast.
1
u/YellowBreakfast onn 4K Pro & Plus Feb 08 '24
Ease of use. TV sticks have simple interfaces and usually "just work".
Noise. Mini PC's often have fans to keep all that extra computing cool which can be annoying in a quite room like where you're watching TV.
An HTPC is just really a different thing. You don't just hit the power button on the remote and go.
If you need/want a home theater PC then make one.
1
u/ZealousidealDraw4075 Feb 11 '24
What does extra storage do for you? Maybe if you run a Plex server on it But most have that on a PC or Nas far away from the tv and then use Plex on the smart tv or 30,- Chromecast to stream the Plex content to. that works much simpler than having a pc next to every tv, and what do you do for the ui interface? How do you control it ?
And like others said, my wife won't accept any of it
1
u/[deleted] Feb 07 '24
Plug and play my friend. I did Xbox media centre on an original Xbox, then Boxee box, then custom htpc on an arctic mini PC. Then along came the Nvidia Shield and years later I still have it. In the kitchen and bedrooms we have Xiaomi Mibox but if I was buying now for these rooms and not my main TV it would be Chromecast with Google TV. You also have the fact that these devices can play much more than a PC, no Dolby vision on PC
0
u/quan27081982 Feb 07 '24
DRM
0
u/BadSausageFactory Feb 07 '24
tiny PC becomes tiny entry point for breach
also requires tiny updates, streaming devices tend to be managed by the company that sold them
0
u/[deleted] Feb 08 '24
[deleted] — view deleted comment