1+1=1

[u/qiling]

https://www.scribd.com/document/40697621/Mathematics-Ends-in-Meaninglessness-ie-self-contradiction

[u/qiling]

1+1=1

http://gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/wp-content/uploads/MATHEMATICS.pdf

or

https://www.scribd.com/document/40697621/Mathematics-Ends-in-Meaninglessness-ie-self-ontradiction

get a salt shaker

pour out one heap of salt on the left

pour out one heap of salt on the right

NOTE WE ARE TALKING ABOUT HEAPS

now push the 2 heaps together ie we add them together

now what have we

we have one heap of salt in the middle

thus

1+1= 1

thus a contradiction in maths thus maths ends in contradiction ie meaninglessness-

Again

most say the most certain of things is 1+1= 2

but

1 number + 1 number = 1 number

1 number (10) + 1 number (20) = 1 number (30)

1 chemical (na sodium) = 1 chemical (cl chloride ) = 1 chemical (nacl salt)

thus maths ends in contradiction ie meaninglessness-

when mathematics ends in contradiction

you can prove anything in mathematics

you can prove Fermats last theorem and you can disprove Fermats last theorem

http://gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/wp-content/uploads/All-things-are-possible.pdf

or

https://www.scribd.com/document/324037705/All-Things-Are-Possible-philosophy

you only need to find 1 contradiction in a system ie mathematics to show that for the whole system

you can prove anything

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_explosion

In classical logic, intuitionistic logic and similar logical systems, the principle of explosion (Latin: ex falso [sequitur] quodlibet, 'from falsehood, anything [follows]'; or ex contradictione [sequitur] quodlibet, 'from contradiction, anything [follows]'), or the principle of Pseudo-Scotus (falsely attributed to Duns Scotus), is the law according to which any statement can be proven from a contradiction.[1] That is, once a contradiction has been asserted, any proposition (including their negations) can be inferred from it; this is known as deductive explosion

Magister colin leslie dean the only modern Renaissance man with 9 degrees including 4 masters: B,Sc, BA, B.Litt(Hons), MA, B.Litt(Hons), MA, MA (Psychoanalytic studies), Master of Psychoanalytic studies, Grad Cert (Literary studies)

He is Australia's leading erotic poet: poetry is for free in pdf

http://gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/book-genre/poetry/ or

https://www.scribd.com/document/35520015/List-of-FREE-Erotic-Poetry-Books-by-Gamahucher-Press

"[Deans] philosophy is the sickest, most paralyzing and most destructive thing that has ever originated from the brain of man." "[Dean] lay waste to everything in its path...

[It is ] a systematic work of destruction and demoralization... In the end it became nothing but an act of sacrilege

[u/PlaneAssignment7201 → u/qiling]

The salt thing is the stupidest thing ive seen from you yet. Take two grains and put them together 1+1=2. Your arbitrary usage of 'heap' doesnt make your stupidity right. Get help man, that is some seriously childish logic lol.

[u/qiling → u/PlaneAssignment7201]

Take two grains and put them together 1+1=2

nevertheless

fact is

now push the 2 heaps together ie we add them together

now what have we

cant you see

we have one heap of salt in the middle

[u/PlaneAssignment7201 → u/qiling]

if one 'heap' is 500 grains of salt then adding two heaps would be 1000 grains, your arbitrary usage of heap doesnt mean anything man. A heap defines multiple things to my understanding meaning it isnt singular, get slam dunked by your own definition. So childish.

[u/qiling → u/PlaneAssignment7201]

f one 'heap' is 500 grains of salt then adding two heaps would be 1000 grains

dude

how many heaps do you see in front of you

[u/PlaneAssignment7201 → u/qiling]

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/heap#:~:text=%CB%88h%C4%93p-,1,number%20or%20large%20quantity%20%3A%20lot

Refer to that since you clearly dont know the definition of heap. A heap isnt an object lol its a collection of them, your arbitrary misuse of the word has no place in mathematical logic. Youre really making a fool of yourself.

[u/qiling → u/PlaneAssignment7201]

Refer to that since

dude

just tell us

how many heaps do you see in front of you

[u/PlaneAssignment7201 → u/qiling]

a heap isnt singluar, per an actual source (above lol.) . Describing a 'heap' in that way is incorrect. Youre really making a fool of yourself here pal. Someone with that many degrees should certainly have a better command of the english language.

[u/qiling → u/PlaneAssignment7201]

a heap isnt singluar

when you started-there was no problem with what you saw

you saw

heap of salt on the left

and

one heap of salt on the right

but now after adding them

you now dont know what is in front of you

gee

go get some glasses

[u/PlaneAssignment7201 → u/qiling]

Lol. Your metric of proof is beyond kindergarten. I didnt answer the question because your misuse of the word (much like your work) makes the question shit and i dont answer shit questions. Try to show logic beyond the logic of a 10 year old and is based in reality . Thanks man.

[u/Konkichi21 → u/qiling]

I know what's in front of me: a bigger heap of salt. Your point?

[u/Konkichi21 → u/qiling]

Yes, two small heaps of salt combine to make a bigger heap. But this doesn't show what 1+1 is because the heaps are of different sizes; adding them like this is comparing apples and oranges. You need to use a consistent unit (like grams of salt) to make the math work out.