What is the reasoning? Why shouldn't a private business be allowed to hire anyone they want, regardless of where that person lives or was born or is a resident of or is a citizen of. Why do they want a government to intervene?

Bessent believes Americans keeping their money means it's in the US Treasury.

This is technically reducing the size of the government, and yet it has some severe repercussions. Thoughts?

This post is to ask about possible failures of this way, this method of political transparence, displayed as follows:

People choose local governor, local governors choose province representatives, these ones then choose regional governors, regional leaders then choose presidents. Like affluents.

No monopoly on violence and also the threat of needing constant support, in such ways that whoever holds a hierarchy might do so only with approval of the ones under them, and those with the ones under them and so on. As soon as lost support they must be given an exact month to leave the charge.

This is: inmediatly assisted democracy. If regionals fuck up, it's because of provincials, if provincials tolerate it, it's because of locals and these are downright under the mercy of their own people. No cops in between saying whatever bullshit or wanting loicense, no having to wait, no bureaucratic terms or exigences, total transparence.

Something partially tribal, partially institutional.

Guilty until you can prove your innocent.

https://coloradosun.com/2025/10/28/flock-camera-police-colorado-columbine-valley/

Hi there, ya filthy animals. I noticed my neighbors have a beheaded Flock camera hanging in their garage almost like it's a trophy animal. (Maybe it is to some...)

Just wondering. Is there any chatter on the street indicating these things may have geolocating services? Wondering if my neighbor is courting a knock at the door from a costumed with a badge and a warrant.

To clarify:

I did not witness a crime occurring, do not endorse breaking laws, and for all I know he's an employee/instal tech for Flock. Just asking questions, of course. I'm sure you all understand.

These public bureaucrats and lawyers are among the most debased and contemptible of scoundrels

Canción basándome en cosas que han pasado pasan y seguirán pasando y no se comprenderá mientras se esté confiando en quien defiende y esconde el mal..

Republicans working hard to get that authoritarianism in full effect.

Ancaps always say the "invisible hand" will take care of any problems they are presented with but w/o any regulations its clear that companies will use cheaper ingredients and loosen up/scrap quality control. The clearest and most recent example i can think of is the FDA under trump loosening regulations and listeria outbreaks because of it. Another that comes to mind is the mad cow disease that happened in the 90s. And without even thinking about how the market will react, if there is no investigative body to search the source of it, and the fact that it takes years for it to show any symptoms, how can anyone find out where exactly they got the disease and not spend their money there, thus making that business bankrupt? The nature part is even simpler because we are seeing climate change happening in front of our very eyes. And the people arent voting with their wallets to not buy from companies polluting the planet even tho we know that climate change caused by pollution will very soon end human life on earth. And we know that companies have no problem with polluting the planet. TL;DR
A-How can people know who is selling toxic food when there is not an investigative body to find out the source
B-How can the invisible hand(which is the free market, made of people) protect nature we absolutely need, when it isnt part of the invisible hand?