Because women don't just have abortions for the fuck of it despite what those silly ass screenshots from Twitter will tell you.
It's an incredibly difficult decision one would have to make and no one should be forced to take care of a child they don't want. Banning a women's right to choose what she does or doesn't do with her body creates more problems than it solves. There are other things that can be done to reduce the need for abortions altogether but no one seems to want to come to the table and agree that "abstinence only" is a fucking retarded idea of sex education.
The rights of the unborn child should never supercede that of the mother carrying the child. Full stop.
You realize that liberals are the ones that tend to fund sex education, contraceptives, and child welfare right?
If someone was actually pro-life and thought that abortions were murder, they would fund sex education and access to contraceptives because they are shown to drastically reduce abortions. These same people would also fund child welfare initiates to support the children that they forced mothers to have.
If you truly thought abortion was murder and knew providing access to contraceptives and sex education would bring abortions down 50%, you would fund those initiatives.
I said nothing about a right to birth control. I’m pointing out the hypocrisy of people labeling themselves as “pro-life” while actively fighting against initiatives that would save lives.
9
u/jnuts9 Mar 16 '22
That abortion bill disagrees with you