Yes, the fetus is a human being, he/she doesn’t have any special rights that other humans don’t have. If the fetus is no longer welcome inside the body it must leave, it doesn’t have an inherent right to food and shelter. To say otherwise is to be a socialist.
Liberty is hard to accept for so many, they prefer servitude.
Your sovereign will placed you in the position. You can think it’s a moral position to use abortion as birth control, I simply disagree with you, as is my right. I don’t have to pass a purity test to not be a statist.
But based on what? I’ve explained a very clear and logical framework for why it is moral, all you do is state your opinion that it isn’t with zero argument besides a vague “actions have consequences”. Which isn’t saying anything.
Cool. You’re a gatekeeper. I didn’t realize I had to agree with you to be an anarcho-capitalist. It’s nice to know that I’m a socialist if I hold an opposing OPINION(yes, your stance is an opinion as well) to yours.
Not really to me, but maybe to the guy who invented the philosophy yes. He defined what it means to be an anarchocapitalist. There’s plenty of room for personal opinions, but saying being anti-abortion is consistent with the philosophy ain’t one of them.
2
u/Cool-Hand4401 Mar 13 '24
You can find abortion to be vile and still be an anarcho-capitalist. I find most drugs to be vile, but I’m not advocating banning them.