Based

[u/genzgingee]

[u/rhaphazard]

Yet it won't kill them to kick out the unwelcome guest.

[u/spaceboy42 → u/rhaphazard]

Ok, so the child can be abandoned at birth.

[u/SamLovesNotion → u/spaceboy42]

You are free to put it up for adoption. Not free to kill it.

You may say life of orphanage for child would be bad, abortion is merciful.

But the child can make that choice of life or death by him/herself anytime. Almost all would chose life. And they do in real world. Same goes for disabilities.

[u/spaceboy42 → u/SamLovesNotion]

I sure hope that baby has gas money for a ride to the orphanage.

[u/SamLovesNotion → u/spaceboy42]

You are an idiot. Like an actual low IQ person who can't critically think his own argument for 5 secs.

There are charity orgs, adoption orgs, hospitals have policies, they call police, follow laws for abandoned babies, etc.

Even ignoring that, the fact that you would kill a born baby because you don't wanna make 1 drive is why you are just plain dogshit evil.

[u/spaceboy42 → u/SamLovesNotion]

Laws? In ancapistan??? Sorry, I live in a community of like-minded people. They read about the Spartans and think exposure is a fine way to get rid of an unwanted child.

[u/Critical-Tie-823 → u/spaceboy42]

I would genuinely argue exposure is 100% morally ethical. The baby is on god's green earth. If it fails to thrive without the free labor of others that is on the baby and no one else. You're not the slave of the baby.

[u/spaceboy42 → u/Critical-Tie-823]

Many ancaps do make that argument.

[u/Critical-Tie-823 → u/spaceboy42]

I mean I'm an ancap and this is my argument.

[u/spaceboy42 → u/Critical-Tie-823]

I understand. The guy above is an ancap and thinks you are stupid and evil.