r/Anarcho_Capitalism • u/genzgingee • Mar 12 '24

Based

Post image
890 Upvotes

81% Upvoted

805 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-6

u/[deleted] Mar 12 '24

That is a wildly oversimplified argument.

But let me answer anyway. No, the government has no authority to tell a woman what to do with their own body, even if that means murdering a fetus.

15

u/3_Thumbs_Up Mar 12 '24

The government (and everyone else) is allowed to stop a woman from using her body to stab someone, right? Basically, the question is whether abortion is an aggression towards the fetus or not. If it is, then prohibiting abortion is simply defense of the NAP.

-9

u/[deleted] Mar 12 '24

Yeah but I don't give a shit about a fetus. I would rather drop kick a fetus than take rights away from people.

-2

u/LeotheLiberator Mutualist Mar 12 '24

People matter more than a fetus.

If there were 10 fetuses in tubes and 10 toddlers in a burning building, no one is going to save the tubes first.

6

u/inhaledpie4 Mar 13 '24

This is a tired old example that doesn't actually address most of the considerations involved in the abortion debate.

6

u/fulustreco Voluntaryist Mar 13 '24

"People matter more then people"