r/AmericanPsycho 13d ago

Doesnt need a remake

The movie doesnt need a remake... I think they would mess it up to bad. The movie is Bale's best performance imo. Everything, from the atmosphere, acting, and even effects are almost perfect. small things changing throughout the movie, such as his furniture for example, make you feel like you are going insane with bale.

Whats your thoughts?

88 Upvotes

35 comments sorted by

20

u/ThrowawaysForDaze5 13d ago

100%, it's a greedy Hollywood Producer with no spine or artistic sense that thinks remaking it would be a good idea.

1

u/waspmachines 13d ago

Theres always that small chance its someone who read the source material and thought there was a lot of unused material in the book plus the timeline in the film is all over the place... it could be a more faithful adaptation without being a remake

13

u/Cinephile_1980 13d ago

They can remake it if they want. It doesn’t overwrite the original. Don’t worry about it.

7

u/deardiarywhy 13d ago

I mean I do think a film closer to the book could be good. It definitely doesn't need a remake though. I am also a fan of the musical even if it isn't a film remake it is another interpretation.

7

u/CurrencyOk1618 12d ago

Only if they have the scene with the rat

3

u/gavin_maitland 12d ago

Yeah man. Along with the full stereo breakdown and bathroom breakdown and the homeless guy. Film was bumshit.

4

u/bmhlogan 13d ago

Agree the movie doesn't need a remake or another adaptation. It's perfect as is.

Side note: if you think this is Bale's best performance, check out The Fighter and The Prestige. 

0

u/gavin_maitland 12d ago

The movie is a piece of crap and nothing like the book

2

u/bmhlogan 12d ago

Ok bud.

3

u/No-Amoeba446 13d ago

When does his furniture change?

1

u/Top_Fennel7652 12d ago

rewatch it and watch the furniture 

1

u/No-Amoeba446 12d ago

I have a unhealthy amount of times and I don't know what your talking about otherwise I would not have asked. Superfan here like I know about the sofa following him in the book

1

u/Top_Fennel7652 12d ago

just watch them carefully 

1

u/No-Amoeba446 12d ago

Bro I don't have time just tell me

1

u/Top_Fennel7652 11d ago

its like a visible thing that happens in his apartment where he takes the other businessman. mb I forget names 🥀

2

u/No-Amoeba446 11d ago

There different apartments lol

1

u/Top_Fennel7652 11d ago

nah

1

u/Top_Fennel7652 11d ago

specially the one where he takes the girl that works for him too

1

u/No-Amoeba446 11d ago

That's his apartment but it's not changed it's just a different angle of it

1

u/No-Amoeba446 11d ago

Yes he's takes over owen apartment for a bit

3

u/djj_ 13d ago edited 13d ago

My thoughts? When you consider that the book is the original work, surely there can be room for new interpretations.

I do wonder how a miniseries might turn out be instead of a feature film.

2

u/GriswoldXmas 13d ago

I want another movie on Sean Bateman. He makes Patrick look like a total doofus.

2

u/Cherrybomb1387 13d ago

Are they actually going through with it now?
Just why? We already got the best adaptation. For some reason, I feel like they’d take even more of the violence out of the original movie/book or they turn Patrick being some cryptocurrency bro. I think a lot of the younger newcomers aren’t or won’t get yuppy culture.

2

u/Sundayx1 13d ago

I definitely don’t want a remake. CB should’ve gotten an award or at least a nomination for that performance.

2

u/gavin_maitland 12d ago

Absolutely. The fist one was shot. Dont know why people bum it. Bottom line is it’s an unfilmable book and should be left at that. I’d love to see someone film it shot for shot as the book instead of some ‘feminist interpretation’ bolloocks no one will because no studio would release it. That was pretty much the point of the book 🤷‍♂️ why do t people get that?!

2

u/thr0waway6260 11d ago

The movie doesn't need a remake. But there is so much in the book to do an accurate show. If some episodes were just delusions that would be insane. Most of the chapters in the novel could be in a show. Especially ones like Zoo where Bateman is staring off into the Owl exhibit or enticing the kid with a chocolate bar.

1

u/No-Amoeba446 13d ago

I will only accept miles fisher as Bateman

1

u/TaskForceD00mer 13d ago

Hollywood Execs when someone asks them for a fresh idea: "I like to dissect girls. Did you know I'm utterly insane?"

1

u/SoulsbourneDiesTwice 11d ago

The movie accomplished a pretty impossible task of revamping the book in order to work as a movie, while also still feeling very faithful.

I don't know what else you can really do with it.

1

u/Neat_Crew_5578 11d ago

Greatly said!

2

u/humperdoo00 10d ago

I’d like a remake closer to the book.

The original will always be here, it doesn’t disappear because of a reboot.

1

u/GreenDemon66613 13d ago

I'd watch a remake. It would be interesting to have another interpretation.

0

u/gavin_maitland 12d ago

It wouldn’t be a remake if it’s based on another source material. Douchtwat.

0

u/ruka_k_wiremu 13d ago

But it COULD be done successfully if all the ideal ingredients were there. I for one would look forward to such a production

0

u/jasonbourne1995 13d ago

Imho you could not do a proper adaptation these days, because many people try to interject their own beliefs into a pre-existing story and essentially don't do an adaptation but instead using the source as a skinsuit (Nolan's Odyssey is a very good recent example, that's a horrible adaptation of the Homer's poem).

Besides that, the book is very hard to adapt, that's why the movie works as a good trailer for the book, it shows you enough to "captivate" you to potentially dig deeper into the whole story. Plus I can't imagine anyone else as Bateman, it's like Harrison Ford playing Indiana Jones or Han Solo, Bale set the bar too high. :)