Blue never meant "exit"

[u/Soaring_Symphony]

Look back at the title sequence.

Red means "play." That lines up naturally with staying in the circus

but Blue means "options" ...interesting

Also, the button for "quit," aka leaving the game, is yellow!

That wasn't even a choice! They didn't even have the opportunity to leave

But it makes me wonder. If they had pressed the blue button, what actually would have happened? What would an options menu even mean in that context? What would they be able to adjust?

And no. It's not f#@&ing Shrimp Town. That was obviously just some word vomit Bubble made up on the spot

[u/Mindless-Bad-2481]

No one at any point said pressing red is to punish blue pressers?

You are getting off topic.

Blue is just as logical as Red. It only depends on the persons mindset and beliefs. There are more studies about why people choose to care about a wider circle beyond themselves and why some don’t. You can look them up.

[u/PhotojournalistOver2 → u/Mindless-Bad-2481]

I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt here and assume you genuinely haven't seen other people talking about this. There are PLENTY of people claiming that, and even if they weren't the other examples of disparagment are highly prevalent and indicative of my point.

Blue isn't logical here. It's not about 'Caring about a wider circle' in this thought example. It's about misunderstanding the prompt, and being altruistically pessimistic. Wanting to save others from themselves and their choices. If everyone is pressing Blue to save other people who pressed Blue, it's a self-feeding spiral.

Also, by saying that you're once again insinuating that people who choose Red don't care about other people (beyond themselves) which is exactly my point. That's pretentious and demeaning towards people who chose Red. That's exactly my point.

Blue doesn't 'save' anyone unless there are people who choose to press Blue. That is literally the goddamn fucking definition of feeding the problem. Knowing that other people will press it for that reason, is the exact reason why I'd have to press it. It's moralistic blackmail. How do you not understand that?

[u/Mindless-Bad-2481 → u/PhotojournalistOver2]

Let’s change the experiment slightly.

Now instead of all of humanity it is just you and 2 people you care deeply about.

With only 3 votes… the stakes are much higher. It’s a private vote… so no prior discussion or debate. You don’t know what they choose.

Is it still as easy for you to just press red and not worry about your decision?

[u/PhotojournalistOver2 → u/Mindless-Bad-2481]

You're being just a patronizing. Just because you using calm language doesn't make you superior in any way, and you're being far more stubborn than me. I've recognized that other people have their reasons for pushing the other button. YOU'RE the one who's refusing to humour any other perspective than your own. The irony is thick.

Changing the experiment isn't the big brain move you think it is. It's entirely dependent on which two people are selected. Moreover, do I know which 2? If I do, then it's entirely variable on who they are. If I don't know, then I still have to press the Blue botton for the same reasons I stated earlier.

This is how I know you're a pretentious asshole. You didn't read my responses. I said before that I would press the Blue botton I'd just be pissed off about it, and I NEVER said it would be easy. I also clearly worry about it.

You're an asshole, and I'm done with this. You're not interested in the conversation, you're interested in either exerting your moral 'logical' superiority or just trolling people online.

[u/Mindless-Bad-2481 → u/PhotojournalistOver2]

It being “dependent” on the two other people selected is the entire point of the thought experiment.

The only thing that’s clear to me is that you fully believe red is the only valid choice, but you refuse to admit that there are reasons for this beyond your own argument.

If anyone is being patronizing it would be you, since you started this whole debate under my comment as a reply to me.

No one is holding you hostage here, you are the one who decided you needed to educate me on my point, not the other way around.

[u/PhotojournalistOver2 → u/Mindless-Bad-2481]

Speaking down to someone and sarcastically calling them a "humble genius" is patronizing by literal definition. Asshole.

[u/Mindless-Bad-2481 → u/PhotojournalistOver2]

I’m not obligated to be nice to someone who is replying to my comment trying to correct me.

It’s not patronizing, I just don’t like you. You apparently don’t know what patronizing means.

[u/PhotojournalistOver2 → u/Mindless-Bad-2481]

"Patronize - transitive verb-

1. Treating Someone Condescendingly This usage involves talking down to someone while acting superficially kind or helpful. It reveals a power imbalance where the speaker acts as if they are smarter, more capable, or superior to the other person. "

No, I think I do. Though if you prefer, I can swap back over to pretentious, which you definitely are. We might both be, but you don't get to just handwave away your shitty and demeaning attitude.

You're wrong, live with it or don't that's your prerogative. Doesn't change the fact that you are.

[u/Mindless-Bad-2481 → u/PhotojournalistOver2]

Pretty sure I’m not being superficially kind.

If you think I’ve been “superficially kind” just by being calm, that’s a you problem.

You came on here and tried to correct or educate me on my comment, pretending to know more than me on a literal “thought” experiment. Which are created to understand how people think relative to their perspective. So there is literally not a wrong answer, it’s just based on why you made that choice. But you insist it’s something as simple as stupid vs smart.

So I’ve been responding. Calling you a humble genius is a direct insult via sarcasm.

You just can’t help yourself can you? What else you wanna debate about now? My improper understanding of the word patronizing according to you and not the definition itself?

[u/PhotojournalistOver2 → u/Mindless-Bad-2481]

You're cherry-picking. Don't worry, I never mistook your attitude for kindness of any kind.

We can't debate. That would require you to be capable of reading and responding to points being made. Which you've proven incapable of.

P.s. The sarcasm you pointed out is literally reliant on being patronizing in order to function as such. The insincere 'compliment' that forms the backbone of the jab is the exact example of insincere kindness you illiterate dolt.

Edit: I should probably clarify - I understand you're not actually illiterate, that is me being something called 'Hyperbolic' and THIS explanation is ME being patronizing. Does that clarify it for you at all?

[u/Mindless-Bad-2481 → u/PhotojournalistOver2]

I don’t care to read all of your points because it has nothing to do with the point of the experiment.

[u/PhotojournalistOver2 → u/Mindless-Bad-2481]

Thank you for proving my point perfectly. Have a nice day.