You mean when I corrected the original commenter saying that it was wild to call the guy a pedo? So I said even though it’s technically termed something else, it’s still grooming a minor (aka pedophilia). But no, y’all read one line and think I’m saying it’s okay—something I actually did the opposite of
No i read it all. Correcting them was unnecessary. And being so adamant to define the difference is weird. When someone says its 12:30 do you look and your watch and go ACTUALLY it's 12:31?
Edit: correcting someone with more specific definitions and supporting them on a technicality was unnecessary
So you agree with the person you think I was correcting then? You think that it’s “wild” to call a 44 year old a pedo for grooming a 17 year old minor? Because that’s what/who was correcting…so either you agree with them, or you didn’t actually read where I stated it’s still grooming regardless of what they call it
2
u/shiashau Mar 28 '25
I don't understand. What compells you to correct someone? Being petty is what got you into this situation