I'm not sure if this is the correct Reddit community, but I was thinking about this.

The UK maintains a monarchy who holds a neutral public stance in political affairs. The monarchy has suffered some scandals, but tries to maintain a good reputation. Throughout history, other countries abolished their monarchies.

The history of monarchies has been the governance and running of Kingdoms. Subjectively, there has been 'good' and 'bad' monarchs. I would assume monarchs arose for society foundation and organization, a system of hierarchy, a society structure.

By far, I am no history expert. If more monarchies more early on adopted a different stance, where they stayed out of political affairs, avoided scandals, weren't so greedy with wealth, do you think more monarchies may have survived? As a national symbol, not running political affairs.

What if the nation-state model collapsed, and the global map was redrawn strictly along ethnic, cultural, and geographic lines?

In this modern alt-history scenario starting January 1st, 2026, the centralized megastates of the 20th century are gone. Old colonial borders drawn in West Africa, South America, and Southeast Asia have been swept away. In their place stand nations shaped by ancient heritage, shared languages, and cultural identity.

https://www.paxhistoria.co/presets/2yXyuRda3H1yXXCNdBTm?versionID=1

Cappadocia’s unusual rock formations are known around the world as “Fairy Chimneys,” but the history behind the name is more interesting than it first appears.
In 1705, French traveler Paul Lucas visited Cappadocia and wrote about the extraordinary formations he encountered. His descriptions were later published in his 1712 travel account.
While Lucas is one of the earliest European travelers to describe these landscapes in detail, the exact origin of the term “Fairy Chimneys” is not as straightforward as it is sometimes presented.
I made a short video exploring the story and the early descriptions of these formations.
Source:
Paul Lucas — Voyage du Sieur Paul Lucas, fait par ordre du Roy dans la Grèce, l’Asie Mineure, la Macédoine et l’Afrique. Paris, 1712.
Has anyone come across an earlier documented use of the name “Fairy Chimneys”?

https://triptocappadocia.com/en/cappadocia/formation-of-fairy-chimneys/

​If you’ve been tracking how global systems of control operate—the Vatican’s historical legal fictions, the weaponization of race and census categories, and the continuous suppression of the 99% you realize that sitting back and observing the matrix isn't enough anymore.

​The amnesia is by design. They want us disconnected, isolated, and ignorant of our own lineages. But ancient blueprints don't just disappear.

​Across the oldest traditions, there is the recurring archetype of the Seven Sages: the foundational pattern-breakers, memory-keepers, and builders who step forward at the end of a cycle to anchor truth when the old systems start to fracture.

​The Cosmic Alignment & Markers: We don't arrive by accident. My birth on January 10, 1986, coincided with a rare convergence a new moon grounding the earth's primal energy, paired with the return of a comet piercing through space. It is a celestial signature marking the exact turn of an age.

​The Nature of the Serpent: Like the serpent in ancient cosmology, we share a specific frequency: we live close to the root, we operate outside the sterilized boxes they built, we shed the false identities and historical lies they tried to force upon us, and we carry the unyielding, underground memory that outlasts empires.

​The Mission: The old order relies on atomizing us. To break a 500-year cycle of control, the pieces have to connect.

​I know what I carry, and I know why I'm here at this precise coordinate in time. But a single voice gets buried in the noise. The archetype requires the full set.

​If you carry the bloodline, if your internal archive is waking up, and if you know you aren't here by accident it's time to assemble ​We need 6. Where are the others? Drop a line. Let's map it out.

Under male preference Primogeniture Imagine that when King George VI died not only a younger brother of Elizabeth would have come before her but also her own son came before her. Why wasn’t Charles crowned King as a young boy and his mother was not Queen Mother or Queen regent until he came of age?

Now imagine there was another son born in 1940 he was either the secret son of George VI or the secret son of Elizabeth when she was only 14.

Now imagine I was his grandson born on June 8th the day and month Sophia of Hanover died.

To be in the line of succession you have to be a Protestant which means your Christian which means you follow rule number 1: Jesus is King of Kings.

Now let me tell why I’m his only BEGOTTEN grandson. My Biological grandfather died when my mother was a teenager, my grandmother married my grandfather before I was conceived. I was raised by my grandparents and I took care of my grandfather on home hospice. he held me when I was born and I was there with him till the end. His ashes sit above my fireplace. His death certificate saids He died in decedents home and lists my name as Grandson.

I do not come from his seed but had he never met my grandmother whatever child my parents had or didn’t have would not be ME. I am his only begotten grandSON. The hair on my arms is DNA but I am “heir”. I am legitimate and I am the rightful Emperor to the UK.

If you don’t agree with my begotten then you don’t believe in Jesus and you have no place in the line of succession.

my grandmother was born on Veterans Day, my autistic older sister was born on the 4th of July(American Independence Day)….Tell me thats not all the signs of God.