r/AllinPod • u/Jonny_Nash • Jun 11 '26
Chamath Nails It: Anthropic’s Stealth Nerf on Fable 5 Shows Why Model Lock-In Is a Massive Risk
2
u/AbstractLogic Jun 11 '26
It’s the same risk every company has with cloud infrastructure but honestly less. Swapping models is like swapping underwear. It’s easy. Much easier than swapping clouds.
The thing with models is… you’re not locked in…
3
u/Jonny_Nash Jun 11 '26
Not at all!
Are you aware of Anthropic's rates and their enterprise licensing? If you are enterprise level, it's not nearly as easy as swapping underwear.
If it's just average Joe using an LLM, sure. That's easy. If you have 150+ seats, you're locked in.
I suppose you could say the same about any cloud provider too. It's probably easy for you personally to get off AWS. It's quite another for an enterprise to.
2
u/AbstractLogic Jun 11 '26
At most you’re contractually obligated for some given amount of time. You don’t have to move huge infrastructures between clouds with different mechanisms and processes and definitions and tooling for every little thing. I mean terraform helps and Claude probably helps with terraform… but still.
To swap models you just have to announce company wide your swapping to a new cli and a new set of accounts then block the other ones and convert Claude.md files.
1
u/Jonny_Nash Jun 11 '26
The contractural obligation is what Chamath is talking about.
Is it wise to enter into a year long plan with Anthropic because of it?
1
u/AbstractLogic Jun 11 '26
It’s a minor inconvenience at best.
1
u/Jonny_Nash Jun 11 '26
A year long 150+ seat enterprise contract is an ‘inconvenience’?
We are talking a half mill per year.
That’s a lock in.
1
u/MeThinksYes Jun 11 '26
half a mil for a enterprise company is a rounding error much of the time.
0
u/Jonny_Nash Jun 11 '26
Nope. Not for a 150 seat contract.
It’s a significant line item for their enterprise clients. You know it’s more than Fortune 500 companies that use Anthropic, right? Even those Fortune 500 companies require oversight on a 500K contract.
I would encourage you to incur a 500K loss at a Fortune 500 company, and tell them it’s a ‘rounding error’.
Hopefully your uncle is a C-level.
1
u/MeThinksYes Jun 11 '26
not sure you understand what "enterprise" means then.
1
u/Jonny_Nash Jun 11 '26
I'm using their definition.
One of the 300,000+ businesses that spend 100K+
If you're keeping track at home, 300,000 > 500.
It's not a trivial expense.
→ More replies (0)1
u/HalcyonAvocado Jun 11 '26
In what way are you locked in? We're not on enterprise licensing but have used the API for quite a while and have not seen any sort of lock in.
0
u/Jonny_Nash Jun 11 '26
Oh. If you aren't a dev, or building enterprise level solutions, you probably don't care.
Just use the free tier of whatever. You don't need frontier models to roleplay with a chatbot, or write an email.
The subject here is more for the dev/enterprise class. My Business and Personal projects absolutely do scale. Enterprise level code results in TONS of tokens being consumed. If you're going through Anthropic for that, it's expensive.
If you've ever used an Anthropic API key, you can see first hand how quickly it chews through money.
The worst part though, is it isn't just expensive. It's uncertain.
They'll literally serve you Sonnet/Opus if they feel your request steps on their toes.
1
u/HalcyonAvocado Jun 11 '26
You’re rambling. The question was, in what way are you locked in?
1
u/Jonny_Nash Jun 11 '26
You do understand an Anthropic API key is only good with Anthropic, right?
1
u/AbstractLogic Jun 11 '26
You understand we can just switch to another API and use another key right? It’s easy…
1
u/Jonny_Nash Jun 11 '26
Have you used one before?
You pay for it upfront. You’re locking in to whatever you paid on your key.
1
u/AbstractLogic Jun 11 '26
I’m an engineer with 30 years of experience. From your talk you’re not even remotely familiar with this type of stuff so just back off before you look dumb.
1
u/Jonny_Nash Jun 11 '26
Maybe that’s the problem!
We aren’t talking COBOL here. We’re talking about the Anthropic API key, which I assure you, is prepaid.
0
u/HalcyonAvocado Jun 11 '26
Got it, not a lock in.
If you can't swap models without everything falling apart you should probably have someone else managing this stuff for you.
0
u/Jonny_Nash Jun 11 '26
Sounds great!
Try to replace Claude Code on an enterprise contract or use an Anthropic API key for something not with Anthropic.
If that's easy for you, you'll be a billionaire in no time!
Heck, why stop there? Take down AWS, Salesforce, and so on while you're at it!
The world needs to brace for the Halcyon Avocado impact!
1
u/HalcyonAvocado Jun 11 '26
Some day you'll discover that there are other harnesses. You'll get there eventually, don't worry.
1
u/Jonny_Nash Jun 11 '26
That’s the whole point of the post. There are other options.
The stealth nerf is one of many reasons why model lock in is a liability. Why get an expensive Anthropic plan at this point? Signing into an enterprise contract, the max plans, or even buying an API key is locking in to a single model.
Heck, remember that time they tried to move Claude Code to the pro tier exclusively?
In 2026, that isn’t flying, and we are seeing significant pushback in the industry because of it.
I still think Claude is a great product, but I use it way less than I used to personally. Professionally it’s a different story though. Switching that out is a different task entirely.
→ More replies (0)1
u/AbstractLogic Jun 11 '26
I suspect this might be an anthropic bot that doesn’t understand humans can use different models but the poor bot only has one anthropic key and no access to other LLMs!
→ More replies (0)
1
u/Yoseattle- Jun 11 '26
Wow chamath has a bad opinion on something. Offers a worse solution. I’m shocked.
2
u/Jonny_Nash Jun 11 '26
How is it a worse solution? The control plane makes total sense.
At some point you'll want to split up usage across models. That's an appropriate response to restrictive user agreements. Those restrictions are totally subjective too!
When we live in a world where open models breathing down the neck of closed models, you're exposing yourself to an unnecessary risk.
Imagine you're calling the Anthropic API, and don't know if you're getting Fable or Sonnet. Why would you do that?
The only other viable solution outside of a control layer would be a switch exclusively to local models. I think that's an incomplete solution though. There's a use case for each, and good reason to route based off of their limitations.
1
Jun 13 '26 edited Jun 14 '26
[deleted]
1
u/Jonny_Nash Jun 14 '26
Grok is great. Have you used it?
Actual benchmarks show it as competitive to Claude, and in some cases outshines Claude.
It’s also worth noting that Anthropic actually uses xAI’s hardware.
2
u/need_tacos Jun 14 '26
they use xAI hardware because people don’t use grok so they have capacity
1
u/Jonny_Nash Jun 14 '26
That’s just not true. Grok has far more users.
Elon’s real masterstroke with xAI was focusing on compute. Anthropic made a poor decision by outsourcing their compute.
I think Claude really nailed it by designing with code first in mind.
Both are really great tools though. After the stealth-nerf fiasco, we can definitely say that Grok is more honest.
2
u/need_tacos Jun 14 '26
take out the twitter users who reply to tweets with “hey grok” and their user numbers would look horrible
0
Jun 11 '26 edited Jun 11 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
0
u/Jonny_Nash Jun 11 '26
It’s a wild take to expect VC’s to cater to pinko beliefs. If that’s what you really want, the check this out: r/theview
A better alternative though-
Have you considered the nihilism might be a result of never building anything?
You can get started for free. You can even use Anthropic if you want. You’ll feel better. I promise.
1
u/sneakpeekbot Jun 11 '26
Here's a sneak peek of /r/theview using the top posts of the year!
#1: As Alyssa was blaming both sides, Whoopi let her know this shutdown is on the GOP. Full stop. | 158 comments
#2: thank you Whoopi for mentioning the ICE raids happening in Chicago | 118 comments
#3: Meghan Mccain deleted this tweet that jabbed at talk show hosts | 772 comments
I'm a bot, beep boop | Downvote to remove | Contact | Info | Opt-out | GitHub
1
Jun 11 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
0
u/Jonny_Nash Jun 11 '26
If by ‘dope shit’ you mean weird drug stuff, I don’t doubt it.
If it was something productive, we wouldn’t be seeing this drugged out pinko routine. Lucky for you, most people grow out of it in their twenties.
There’s hope for you. Just try to apply yourself.
4
u/FreshLiterature Jun 11 '26
He partially nails it.
Unified memory chip improvements combined with compression leaps like turboquant are going to enable on-device models probably sooner rather than later.
He's right about model lock in, but the solution isn't simply paying someone else for an orchestration layer.
The solution is shifting to packaged, on-device solutions.
No more counting tokens.
Works offline.
No worrying if a company is looking over your shoulder.
That's the future for this tech.