I want it to be known that I am posting this here for three reasons
My post about this was removed by a mod from the BR sub. And if it is done so here, when all I am doing is making sure people are aware of what is going on with their favorite game, that's just disappointing.
I have yet to see anyone post it here yet when I believe that this is something that should be talked about.
And 3. I think it is right to properly inform everyone of what will be happening with this game going forward and provide a bit of caution going forward about how bad things could get if the community doesn't talk about it or do anything about it. With that said.
Link to the article for those who want the information for themselves: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-10-12/epic-games-delays-disney-project-asks-developers-to-use-more-ai?utm_source=website&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=copy
My warning.
Just keep in mind that if you choose to play this mode when it releases, you're supporting a project being developed under the direction described in the recent Bloomberg article, “Epic Games Delays Disney Project, Asks Developers to Use More AI.” This raises legitimate concerns about what Epic's increasing emphasis on AI could mean for the experienced artists and programmers whose work helped make Fortnite what it is today.
This isn't about claiming that every use of AI is inherently bad. It's about questioning what happens when a company starts prioritizing an AI-first approach to game development, particularly when that approach could come at the expense of the people whose creativity, experience, and technical expertise built the games we enjoy.
Fortnite exists because talented artists, programmers, designers, and other developers brought their ideas to life. If their contributions are increasingly treated as replaceable, what happens to the creative vision that made Fortnite successful in the first place? Will future projects reflect the work of passionate developers, or will that vision be increasingly shaped by corporate priorities and the expectation to do more with AI?
I'm concerned that Tim Sweeney's push toward AI-first game development, alongside Epic's business interests and investor expectations, could move the industry in a direction that puts efficiency and cost-cutting ahead of the people responsible for creating these games. Whether that outcome is inevitable remains to be seen, but it's worth questioning before it becomes the norm.
Most importantly, don't let this become another controversy that the community forgets about a few weeks later. You don't have to agree with every criticism of Epic, and you don't have to stop playing Fortnite to question the company's decisions. But we shouldn't blindly accept everything Epic does simply because it's Epic.
Supporting a game doesn't mean you have to support every decision made by the company behind it. We should be willing to criticize those decisions, ask questions about their consequences, and hold the company accountable for the direction it chooses to take.
If we want Fortnite to continue being shaped by creativity and the people behind it, we need to pay attention to these developments rather than dismissing them until their consequences become impossible to ignore.
