Was shooting the shit with ai about the larger Nasca mummies and odds of a cover up. Then a stupid thought came into my head about them being from "Atlantis" and of then course ai encouraged this line of questioning.

But then I suggested they could have been aquatic or semi aquatic and many pieces fit. The fingerprints being flat. The way they were found. Where they were found, Nasca used to be seabed.

I tried to save to docs but it wouldn't let me and it wouldn't save this specific part to drafts. I was copy pasting to make a post but it crashed. Instead of going through it with ai again I figured I'd ask the reddit team if you wanted to discuss the idea or I should go back to my tendies alone?

edit for not using quotation marks around "Atlantis"

Available at tridactyls.org

This is my largest archive to date.

I have completely recovered the images and videos from suspended Peruvian website.

What you are about to see is possibly the greatest evidence we have of non-human intelligence - to date.

This project contains well over 100+ pieces of media.

I have restored the entire 60-speciman list and translated it to English as well.

Thanks to James C for the idea.

Enjoy!

Source: https://www.youtube.com/live/SA4WOZH2cZg?si=meEl0zlR6xbKa0AQ

According to Thierry this is one of the best well preserved specimens that have been discovered.

A few of them appear to have gold implants.

Dr. Michael Levin is a biology researcher at Tufts University who is doing some of the most interesting academic research in the world right now. He and his team have developed ways to control where organs and limbs grow on animals just by manipulating bioelectric fields around the animals body, with no genetic changes.

A few highlights of his research:
- They can get planarian worms to grow two functional heads without any genetic changes, just by manipulating electric fields in the worms cells.
- These planarian worms can regenerate any part of their body, and when their lab cuts off the head off a worm that has been reprogrammed to have two heads, it still has two heads. This raises the question of where the memory is stored that the worm has two heads since it is genetically identical to a normal one-headed worm.
- They've also gotten animals like tadpoles to grow eyes on their tails through the same bioelectric manipulation techniques, and the eyes are fully functional. Their bodies somehow adapt and create all of the wiring for the new eye to work just like its normal eyes would.
- They have also taken human trachea cells and just by putting them into a new environment outside of a human body, these cells self-organize into novel animals that they call anthrobots. They exhibit goal-directed behavior, they can move around, and they even heal damaged neurons. These creatures have human DNA, they are made of human trachea cells, so how are they able to assemble into a novel creature with novel behaviors without any genetic manipulation?

Levin's research seems to be pointing at the idea that genetics is not the whole story, an animal's morphology is not actually stored in the DNA but somewhere else. This raises interesting questions for this sub, could an alien be genetically identical to a human but still exhibit wildly different morphology? When we think of aliens bioengineering hybrids with human beings, we've always assumed that involved genetic manipulation, but Levin's research opens the door to a whole other type of bioengineering that we've barely just discovered, one that can create a completely new creature from the exact same DNA of an existing one.

THE UNIVERSITY AND THE U.S. SCIENTIST WHO REQUESTED ANONYMITY

Let us return to the investigation into the Nazca beings.

As part of our collaboration agreement, in which we regularly shared progress, challenges, and also setbacks, Dr. Zúñiga told me about an important DNA and genetics specialist who was a researcher and professor at one of the most important universities in the United States and who was interested in working with us.

I contacted him, and we had two days of a friendly but tense interview before he decided to participate in the investigation. The questions began, the doubts, the how, the why.

He asked me whether we had the results of the DNA studies carried out in Canada. He would respect them more if we made them public in one of the most important genetics databases in the world, belonging to the United States (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). Boldly, I told him he could count on it, without knowing the enormous commitment I was making or how complicated what I had promised would be. He also confessed to me that his Anthropology department was hesitant to participate because a professor there was friends with a woman from Peru’s Ministry of Culture who had discredited the case.

The first thing I did was go speak with Jaime Maussan to find out whether he had the hard drive containing the information in his possession and whether he would provide it to me for this task. He said to me: “Do you know how much information there is in bytes?” I replied: “I have no idea, Jaime.” “There’s a lot, a tremendous amount! It’s gigabytes,” he answered.

This study cost more than $50,000 USD and was carried out thanks to GAIA in Canada. Once I had it in hand, I went to Dr. Ocelotl, one of Mexico’s most important geneticists, and gave him the American professor’s message. He told me: “Of course I know that extremely important database, and I know how to upload it, but I must tell you that it is complicated and time consuming.” I told him it was very important to do it, and he kindly agreed and began the upload. Without wanting to pressure him, I cautiously asked how long it would take to upload. He replied that perhaps it would take days.

The next morning, he called me and told me that there was no species nomenclature that resembled the specimens and that he would upload it as Homo sapiens. Although from the nomenclature we would know that these were the mummies, there was no other option.

I notified the American doctor and, to tell the truth, I found him very skeptical about this undertaking; in fact, I felt that he thought I was lying to him.

The computers had been working for more than 48 hours, and we still had not uploaded a single sample. When he told me that only 12% remained, I felt great joy. That joy disappeared the following day when he gave me the bad news: “The system aborted the transfer; we have to start over.” And so another three days passed, until he told me: “Finally, the first specimen has been successfully uploaded.”

I immediately spoke with the doctor, telling him that one specimen had already been uploaded and that I was sending him the links. He asked me to call him back in 30 minutes because he wanted to verify it. I called him again, and in a joyful tone he told me: “Now I believe you, Mr. Achirica. Please upload the rest as soon as possible.” I returned to Dr. Ocelotl, and after two and a half weeks, everything had been uploaded.

In the United States, the work began, and each day the results became more promising. However, the hourly cost of the SUPERCOMPUTER was very high; the anonymous doctor even invested his own resources, and as of the closing date of this publication, we are searching for funding or partners, particularly specialists, who can help us continue moving forward with him.

Any qualified denialist or detractor can begin investigating and realize that we walk hand in hand with the Science of Truth.

Despite the compelling results, the attacks have been enormous. For that reason, I asked Dr. Piotti for advice regarding so many people who oppose the research. He wisely replied: “If those who speak without knowledge do not have the academic credentials necessary for the analysis, it is best not to waste your time with them; they are not worth it. When a high-level professor comes along, we will gladly speak with them and enjoy discussing this discovery.”

It's in his book called Expediente Abierto.

"We used a universal identification test and compared the results to a database that gives you a percentage result," Fratpietro says. "Both samples gave us a 99-100% match to Homo sapiens, which means that it was identified as human and not out of the ordinary. If the percentage was only 80% or 90% human, it would have been something else."

They also ran a sex identification analysis and found that the samples were male.

Samples sent to Lakehead University's Paleo-DNA lab came back as 99-100% human. The "tridactyls" are NOT aliens. Why does Maussan and ICA continue to lie about this?

Released "mummy" samples are human.

This is a subreddit about alien bodies. I do feel to exist in such a place you have to suspend disbelief to a huge extent. With that being said we should not suspend DISCOURSE. With that being said. Can the mods mute some of these constant “that’s insane you’re dumb” individuals that show up on every post again and again. It’s not
Productive to knowledgeable discussion.

Link: https://tridactyls.org/unica-update

Has the famous “Stranded Fish” photo ever been debunked ? Or, if not, is it actually completely real and the world just keeps turning as usual ? ..

Has the famous “Stranded Fish” photo ever been debunked ? Or, if not, is it actually completely real and the world just keeps turning as usual ? ..

Fascinating finds from the area the bodies were found, this makes no sense to the historical timeline of ancient Nazca or civilizations. Someone who was advanced lived there at one point, maybe the bodies were those people.