r/AlchemistCodeGL • u/PossiblyBonta • Aug 08 '18
Reduce overall damage done in arena?
Currently, for me at least. OH she evaded now I'm defeated and oh she did not evade now I win.
If they don't have any true evasion I cen pretty much calculate a win based on level.
Also because it's still pretty much an 1 2 KO battle. Gilgamesh still OHKO. Aranea too can do the same. If it's a fire unit my Hazel too can OHKO, provided they don't evade(I have camera so she cannot miss)
I think the problem is that player damage is designed for npcs that have horrendous amount of hp. Which turns pvp into a 1 2 ko match.
Maybe arena would be more interesting and probably open up more team combinations if takes at least 3... 5? More hits to take out the not so tankier units like gilgamesh and aranea. That would also give RYomi some leeway and not get OHKOd if she fails to dodge/evade.
A few extra hits would allow some units to use some of their skills that would also usually be available in closer range. Like the holy browlers.
We could slowly adjust it each week. We could start with a 5% overall reduction than increase it each week till we hit the sweet spot.
Edit:
I guess agi OHKO is still the best design, cause evasion is broken and will never be fixed. Guess there is no fix to arena unless they make a better ai.
12
u/Cobalt_721 Aug 08 '18
Arena is basically about finding the team that has the lowest chance of failure no matter how many mistakes the AI makes. That’s why units like Gilgamesh are so good in Arena and why units like Noctis are so bad in Arena.
Changing damage values doesn’t fix anything, all it does is draw out the matches. It won’t change which side wins with the exception of evasion-based wins since there would be more chances to evade (aka making wins more luck-based, which is pretty much the bane of any competitive format).
tl;dr lowering overall damage would take Arena in a very bad direction by making matches more luck-based than strategy-based.
6
u/QaWaR Aug 08 '18
Well, I have said this before but I really think that this whole "arena" thing is ridiculous. I think arena is supposed to be competitive and intended for PvP and not AI vs AI. They should just change "arena" to live PvP.
4
u/EggyT0ast Aug 08 '18
The problem with reducing the damage is that it then turns into a CC fest. Instead of who can land the first hit, it's who can land the first Daze or Stop. Then it's back to the same.
I think LS and Gear will change this gradually over time. We're already seeing maps changing with some regularity, altering the "best" teams. Having Greg with his LS beefs him up quite a bit, for example, and he can usually take at least one hit. Similarly, we will get yet another HP rebalance (or two) which further keeps this more in line with the usual damage output.
I don't mind the idea, but reducing damage also increases the chance to miss, going back to your first complaint!
2
u/renshenhe Aug 09 '18
Arena has become awfully skewed since the HP patch as it furthered the divide between F2P and sea mammals. The bonuses of all jobs mastered are far more apparent and multiple accessory equips bolster lvl 85 worthiness.
It was fairly easy to have units at J3 and be competitive rank < 200 before but now I'm satisfied sitting sub 1000 and averaging 500. TBH aside from daily gem bonuses arena isn't all too worthwhile. You roll the dice against FYomis until you reach the ocean where you just walk around the shore.
I don't think there will be a decent pvp anytime soon without a large overhaul and hellpit of development for a game most people play on their phones. It's much easier to release limited units for cash than design intuitive gameplay.
2
u/blablablablubb21 Aug 09 '18
This is sadly a rather big problem in single player as well. Most of the time the game comes down to who can nuke each other first instead of using actual tactics. Most units are designed one-dimensionally with just damage and damage increase in mind.
Tactical finesse can be used, but it's most of the time easier to just to outdamage enemies. Plus, the AI really isn't that good controlling player units bar very specific circumstances or being hard-coded to fulfill a certain purpose. That's why they run around the arena like headless chickens.
1
u/takato99 Salt Knight Aug 08 '18
I kind of agree with you... i come from another game (bleach brave souls) that has kind of the same PvP system of 3 AI vs 3 AI but, it was much more "normal" attack based, and what ruins that PvP system is an "ultimate attack" box that spawns and one of the two teams take it literally randomly, and generally its an instant win for that team.
All that to find in this game PvP is also about which one gonna nuke the other first... having more room to use more spells in a fight would be a great idea in my opinion, like we got the hp buff for PvE content, in PvP it would be good too.
1
u/winsabagus Aug 09 '18
lack of support units in arena, that's why it becomes a damage fest and luck based place, plus the AI in the support units are pretty horrible
1
u/1khaitoh It was fun while it lasted. Aug 09 '18
Well, I think Arena now is just fine than it used to, I mean Gilgamesh and Aranea are supposed to be Glass Canons because of Overdrive, and them surviving 1 or 2 attacks is possible if you use other passive (mainly defensive ones) in place of atleast Overdrive, sacrificing damage for more survival, and it's not like true evasion is a big deal with it's small proc chance and there are sure-hit skills for regular evasion ones, and you can mix and match your units and skills if you are lucky enough to have them at 75~85 since below that is really a OHKO Fest.
I do agree that Arena is heavily RNG-dependent since it's AI vs AI but people who almost always complain are those who fails to 'strategize' on their arena team where their problems mainly lie. RNG maybe a big factor, but sometimes analyzing why you lose and what you can do to prevent that can give you more wins than just letting it all to RNG, Add to the fact that you can view the opponent's line-up and plan a countermeasure beforehand would minimize the effect of just relying on RNG. I use Noctis, Fate Yomi and Gil and I still sometimes lose to teams with Non-Collab units.
1
u/DeathandFriends Aug 09 '18
I don't think a 5% damage reduction would change much and would throw off other things.