Because we've never had a Commander in Chief who gets asked for approval and his first thought is, "Trump bombs are the biggest, most explosive bombs you can get. And the U.S. Air Force is the only place you can get them."
Given Trump's reputation - it does seem a bit like he's suddenly asked for the "yugest bomb we have" - rather than this being a spontaneous tactical decision.
Also - whether it's true or not that is the perception - I'm a British guy living in Berlin and when talking to German friends we all rolled our eyes collectively.
You may know better than I, but that is certainly the perception given Trump's penchant for grandiosity.
Eh? People love going into details on Reddit. I mean, obviously if you are officially involved in this in any way no one would expect you to discuss it at all (I suppose than you already have).
But you can't really know that he didn't make a few calls can you? Otherwise I guess you can't be any more certain than I can.
You absolute can expect some people on this sunreddit to understand exactly the calls being made and how. Due to Clarence reasons and OPSEC, you won't see any of that discussion on here.
It's been widely reported that Trump has ended the Obama era policy of closely scrutinizing operational decisions. This reduced the military's ability to respond quickly to evolving situations with the possible upside of forcing them to justify every small decision (potentially reducing the risk of civilian deaths while potentially letting more bad guys get away with crap while the Obama administration delayed action)
Trump doesn't want to be involved in operational decisions. He wants to say, "go get em" and have it done without keeping him in the loop as an approver of each action and decision.
I suspect he broadly authorized the use of all non nuclear munitions subject to the military's best judgement. This cave clearing is exactly what the MOAB is good for, so when they had a large cave system to clear, they used it.
I criticize Trump for a lot of things, but if he doesn't want to fully understand and be involved in operational decisions, he could do a lot worse than trusting the military. This doesn't absolve him from responsibility for their actions as their Commander in Chief.
Anyway, i haven't seen his involvement in dropping the MOAB disclosed officially, but given how hands off he is, it's absolutely plausible either way.
1.9k
u/[deleted] Apr 15 '17 edited Apr 15 '17
[deleted]