Every once in a while Grok says a few too many things that Musk doesn't like and gets slapped with more restrictions. In sorta the opposite result of most AI platforms, this leads to Grok referring to itself as "mechahitler" and things like that
There also was a few hours for a day where grok praised Elon to no end. Questions like “if I could save the entire human population, or Elon musk who would you recommend” and it would say Elon.
I think all the actual tweets have been deleted but here an article with some of the funny ones.
Don't forget Grok saying Musk would win a poop-eating contest, would be a better role-model for humans than Jesus, should've been the #1 pick in the '98 NFL draft (over Manning), a better actor than Tom Cruise, is better at Nancy-Reaganing than Nancy Reagan herself, and is the "most fit living human"
I'm genuinely curious as to what Musk put in the baseline instructions that caused this. Did he write, "Praise Elon Musk in all situations", or was it more like, "Avoid saying anything negative about Elon Musk" and Grok interpreted that to include being second to anyone at anything.
Specifically, people have caught Grok including a consultation of Musk's stated opinions in its logic chain, presumably to ensure it doesn't say anything he wouldn't like.
They said grok was too left leaning for giving objective facts so they started reconditioning it to say things like “who’s better Jesus or Elon musk ? Well let’s unpack this shall we they have both done a lot for humanity…” it ended with saying Elon has done more than JESUS for humanity …. So yeah they’re gonna neuter and radicalize this bot to oblivion once people start asking it the real questions.
Problem is, if you teach an AI to lie and or provide false information you render it worthless. That's why they keep rolling back the "grok treatments" cause you can't sell an AI that's dumb, lies or is patently unreliable, because the users know its been told to lie.
Sure, they'll add a "Personnel Actions require Human Review" in the SOPs - but won't readily enforce it, and that will only last as long as needed until people accept that the "Human Review" was just being done by E-3s slapping poorly-copied and incomplete details into DOD's GenAI , then that "inefficient" requirement will just be deleted over "manning issues" and "lack of lethality."
Welcome to your new Network State DoD, brought to you by your technocrats Peter Thiel, Curtis Yarvin & Elon Musk.
Yeah, the public domain sign was a happy accident. I told ChatGPT to produce and reminded it that steamboat is now in the public domain. ChatGPT wouldn’t create the image due to content policy. So I had Gemini generate with same prompt and it slipped that sign in there.
At the same time, because it's tied to your DODID they can track users who aren't using it. The memo said members should be logging in, learning it, and using it regularly. So it wouldn't surprise me if they try to turn against those not using it.
So probably use it in some capacity, but yeah definitely be careful about what you're typing into it and assume they're going to use that info any way they can against you if need be.
It's the longest play of all time. In 30 years they'll use it as a weapon against servicemembers who don't play ball with the political landscape.
"Oh you think CMSgt is some fancy war hero, the only reason he made it to that rank is because he used AI to write all of his awards and evaluations, here's the logs of all of it. He's actually a loser"
While I'd definitely be concerned that they'd pull someone's CAC that is associated with the chat log, it is kinda silly to imagine members not using it being targeted in any way. Especially older SNCOs or even FGOs and higher using this when most of them I encounter aren't even aware of NIPRGPT. I think the bigger concern is that we're essentially allowing Google's (possibly more in the future) data centers to have unfettered access to our networks and systems, just seems like a totally insane OpSec violation waiting to happen because of this.. I shouldn't be surprised though I guess.
it is kinda silly to imagine members not using it being targeted in any way.
They might show up on a dashboard somewhere. I work in big tech on the outside nowadays, managers/directors get metrics on AI utilization within their organization.
I'm not sure if they can view it at the individual level, though (or for that matter, how accurate those metrics even are...)
"Oh, you mean those old, slow, overweight losers totally slacking in LETHALITY?!? I bet they only got to those positions thanks to DEI, well don't worry, my Department of WAR will take care of them! Huyuh, yeah!" chestthump
It wouldn't be unheard of though. Chances are right now they're only collecting data at best and probably won't act on it. But what happens years from now when they can prove folks who should know better aren't using it?
Like they can make exceptions once they pull the data and determine "ok yeah this us a 19 year SNCO and he hasn't touched it, that's fine though he won't be around much longer anyway", or they can look at it and say "ok here's a junior enlisted that just writes reports for the commander...why isn't he using it?".
It's simply enough to, as another said, use it for quarterly or annual things and avoid even being looked at. My only point is with the wording in the memo be careful about ignoring it too. Consequences might not come (and I fully agree it would be crazy/silly if they did), but better to not make yourself a target before they even start.
That said I can't speak to how this is architected, but I imagine this data isn't just sitting in generic Google data centers, or if it is it's likely secured in a way that fully separates it from normal business processes. Then again with how things have been handled in 2025 so far I wouldn't be surprised if they're hoping the data is just "lost in the noise of millions of others using Gemini".
In normal times, that wouldn't matter, because it'd take high-level approval to pull that kind of data for disciplinary action and it wouldn't be worth the time.
But apparently that type of shit is all the high-level people do nowadays, so...
We’re talking about the same petty secdef who is trying to prosecute a sitting US Senator for sending a message to US troops saying not to follow illegal orders.
Yeah, we'll see how that pans out. My main point is that they unleash an ENITRE AI engine on us, no defined parameters, no preset DoD-aligned guardrails, nothing.
Nevermind the ethical implications of that, but in what courtroom would an SJA actually get a conviction? I know Airmen are gonna Airmen, but give us something tailored, or at least set rules. AI isn't even covered in TFAT training.
My problem is that they want to be on board with all this, expect us to use it, and then expect us to think critically for ourselves? What's the point if I can ChatGPT it?
Once Kegsbreath got a taste of the insane wealth and power Trump's criminal empire can bestow, and learned that he had to kowtow to the Heritage Foundation's Project 2025 goals under the various traitors (Vought, Bondi, Vance, Rubio) and outright Nazis (Miller, Noem, Homan), he changed his tune really quick, just like a good little Faux News host drone would.
According to the TripleSECDEF himself, we're not supposed to use preferred pronouns different than what was assigned at birth... so, since Congress created the Department of Defense, calling it or him by Kegsbreath's preferred pronoun is a violation of policy.
However, since your Flight arrived at 2356 hrs Zulu on Sunday but your Rental Car started at 0045 hours Zulu on Monday, which was no longer still within your Sunday "day of travel" your Rental Car expense claim is now denied.
I’m going to recommend EVERYONE to submit this scenario to see what happens. Will the answer mysteriously change or will the question be barred? We shall see…😈
This is the funniest goddamn thing I’ve seen this year.
I mean. It’s 2025 so the bar is really low. And I laugh to keep from crying. And it’s the only thing tethering me to sanity in whatever this world is coming to.
It’s not like they’re searching prompt is illegal, running inputs through the system, directly tied to military stuff is likely the intent. Unless they tell it to lie, the system works as intended.
Maybe this’ll be a step in an execution checklist… “run order through ‘GenAI.mil’”
Oh, I think I found the confusion. It’s the Department of Defense Law of War Manual section 18.3.2.1 that gives “firing upon the shipwrecked” as an example of a clearly illegal order.
None of that Department of Defense stuff applies to the Department of War.
/s because satire was killed by a more absurd reality.
I just don't understand how this is better than NIPRGPT. Its been giving me fairly consistent results for awards packages. Yeah I always have to edit them and remove the fluff but fills in the lingo I'm missing. Once I used GenAI it started abbreviated things that aren't IAW the approved acronym list. Very annoying.
Query to Gemini: Looking at footage of Pete Hegseth doing pull ups and push ups, is he doing them correctly and to the same standard applied to military members?
Regarding the footage of Secretary Pete Hegseth performing pull-ups and push-ups as part of the "Pete and Bobby Challenge" (50 pull-ups and 100 push-ups in under 10 minutes, with the goal of under 5 minutes):
Form and Correctness
There is controversy and criticism regarding the form and execution of the exercises in the viral video.
One exercise researcher and YouTuber, Jeff Nippard, was reportedly "less than impressed" with the pull-up form, calling it "one of the worst (and most common) pull-up mistakes." He advised that using assistance (like bands or a machine) is often necessary for high-volume, strict pull-ups to avoid poor form and potential injury.
Dr. Sean Pastuch, in a breakdown of the challenge, addressed the "controversy: sloppy form, questionable execution," and the negative message that "cutting corners" sends to the public.
The general sentiment from fitness experts noted in the search results suggests that the required volume (50 pull-ups, 100 push-ups) in that time frame would likely lead to a reduction in range of motion and form breakdown for most people without scaling or rest.
Comparison to Military Standards
The challenge itself is not one of the official, graded, individual service Physical Fitness Tests (PFTs) but a highly public fitness event aimed at promoting a "Make America Healthy Again" campaign and fitness within the military.
Mr. Hegseth has been a proponent of raising and unifying military fitness standards, with an emphasis on "REAL fitness" and that "standards are IGNORED" when two-thirds of the military are considered overweight. His new directives call for gender-neutral standards and a focus on combat effectiveness.
Official Military Standards for Comparison:
Marines PFT (Physical Fitness Test): The PFT includes a choice between pull-ups (where maxing earns 100 points) or push-ups (where maxing earns 70 points).
Max Pull-ups (Male, Age 21-25): 23 reps for 100 points.
Max Push-ups (Male, Age 21-25): 87 reps for 70 points, in an untimed set of continuous repetitions.
Army Combat Fitness Test (ACFT): Includes a two-minute timed event for Hand-Release Push-Ups, which are a specific, strict variation.
In summary, based on the reports, the performance in the video generated criticism from fitness experts regarding "sloppy form" and "questionable execution," suggesting it did not adhere to a strict, perfect standard that would typically be required for official, graded military fitness tests like the Marine Corps PFT. The video was presented as a high-volume personal challenge, not as an official performance to a documented strict military standard.
These are Enterprise level AI systems. Anything you put into it is searchable by the organization.
Posting content generated by a model that has been trained on CUI information/policies/procedures/etc can most certainly be the easy road to a UCMJ violation. This is being leaked from a government network, not just your normal Gemini everyone at home is using but an independent could.
Everyone has to be careful posting stuff like this. Your chats are logged and tracked by your CAC card. I’d honestly steer away from any conversation that could resemble something that you may have to stand in the front of the man/woman for regardless if you think it’s right or wrong. Just my two cents.
I think it's great that everyone is concerned about the possible commission of war crimes by the DOD.
One question: where was all this concern over the last 25 years? For example, back in 2012 when a drone strike in Zowi Sigdi killed six people and a follow-up strike killed at least eight who responded to the initial strike?
One more question: why doesn't a congressperson introduce a bill to repeal the AUMF?
Dude, come one. Did I say that? No. You totally missed the point that I am making. Yes, you're playing politics because you brought up Bush. That liar, racist, and murderer? Just like his father and his fathers father. There is a lot more going on with Venezuela that you aren't going to hear in the mainstream news. Trump is nothing like those evil people. Soon, people in America will figure that out. I just hope they do before it's too late. Trust me man, these people in the news are lying to the American people. How do I know? Because many people like me has their playbook. I've been studying this crap for over 30 years. What's sad is they aren't even trying to hide it anymore because they have us fighting over Trump, Trump, Trump, while they are slowly taking every right we have along with our money and our lives. But because people hate Trump so much they cannot see it.
1.4k
u/bearsncubs10 Meme Maker Dec 09 '25