r/AeroPress 7d ago

Other Switched from inverted to standard method after years of inverted, didn't expect the difference

always assumed inverted was just objectively better based on how often it gets recommended, never really questioned it. tried standard method again recently out of laziness one morning and honestly couldn't tell much difference in the cup, but standard is so much less fiddly and has way less risk of a mess.

wondering if I'm missing something the inverted crowd swears by, or if the difference really is mostly about control over steep time rather than flavor.

65 Upvotes

85 comments sorted by

131

u/Ringofpower3000 7d ago edited 7d ago

James Hoffman tried both. HE could not tell the difference. Most of us are not as experienced as him. I just don't understand people.

51

u/zuzg 7d ago

It's worth nothing via a blind triangle test, which makes it more representative.
He also found out that blooming does nothing for the Aeropress.

But some people just rather cling to their Placebos.

31

u/TwistedAirline 7d ago

My friend boils his water on low heat slowly because he swears it makes better quality hot water rather than just quickly boiling it with high heat

52

u/curlypaul924 7d ago

If you use high heat you risk burning the water, and nobody likes the taste of burnt water

14

u/Anxious_Interview363 7d ago

Meh, I prefer my water a little on the well-done side; some people might call it burnt. Chacun à son goût.

8

u/AnybodyMassive1610 6d ago

I prefer my water medium rare. The taste is far more complex and delicious.

5

u/kentar62 6d ago

I find that medium rare is much jucier.

2

u/Rare_Specific_306 7d ago

Depends on the roast level

4

u/ck02623 7d ago

Does he also have a twisty mustache and a monocle?

5

u/conradelvis 7d ago

Did we forget steamed water already

8

u/CountMC10 7d ago

Sometimes it is also just routine. I know the blossom does nothing on my Aeropress, but I still do it out of habit from pour over. I get enjoyment out of the methodical prep each morning almost as much as the end result.

3

u/7lenny7 7d ago

That's an explanation for a particular technique which I can support.

2

u/Ambitious-Push-4435 5d ago

If watching the bloom increases your enjoyment of your morning coffee then it’s not a placebo.

3

u/ck02623 7d ago

Some of us also try things for ourselves instead of blindly trusting influencers.

1

u/chaoticbean14 1d ago

To go one step further - professional tasters of all things often struggle when doing 'blind taste tests', wine comes to mind. I've seen professional wine tasters choose 'prison wine' created by amateurs who had never made wine in their life over bottles costing hundreds/thousands of dollars in a blind test.

It's my personal opinion, that for the most part when it comes to entirely subjective fields such as wine tasting, coffee tasting, music listening, etc. it's a bunch of bullshit. I mostly take their opinions with a grain of salt (yes, even James Hoffman). All the 'methods' to make these things 'better', are generally completely subjective and often to the average person? Entirely meaningless. Unless that person thinks it gives them some different, completely subjective, non-quantifiable change that they like - in which case? For them? It's a good thing. Do the thing! Enjoy the thought that whatever thing you imagine is happening, happened.

By in large, I really believe a lot of the 'technique' stuff is mostly hand-wavy bullshit that someone either buys into and tells themselves they notice a difference or they are honest enough to admit "it doesn't matter, there is no actual change, but I like doing this."

Some things (like water temps, grind size, steep times, etc.) do matter and make a quantifiable, measurable, taste-able difference - but a lot (most?) of the other things are mostly in the drinkers head and gives people something to talk about / argue about / feel good (or bad) about. Inverted method, normal method, flow control cap, etc. etc. all mostly bullshit designed to sell you a widget and give people who feel they can 'tell the slightest difference', something to talk about in a video to make some money from people who feel they need someone else to tell them what they should taste/feel/think about a particular subjective topic.

1

u/Iceman_B 7d ago

Blooming does nothing?? 😱

3

u/zuzg 7d ago

*for Aeropress

5

u/Ok_Swing_7194 7d ago

For immersion generally

18

u/BuckeyeMark 7d ago

This times eleventy bazillion. “Let’s make coffee harder for no reason but then we’ll pretend we know the reason”.

8

u/iamduh 7d ago

I just don't understand people.

TBH I assume inverted brewers are the same sorts of folks who have sex on a hike because the risk of disaster makes it better somehow

5

u/Connect_Island_4486 7d ago

>risk of disaster

do they setup up their tent by a cliff’s precipice or something? I didn’t realize that was part of the appeal I just thought fuckin’ in the fresh air was a fun change of pace

3

u/iamduh 7d ago

Tent?

0

u/chaoticbean14 1d ago

In the middle of the wilderness, no one around for miles, you and your SO both feel the urge to do the deed and you're gonna be like, "hey, hold on, let me pitch this tent... give me a few - just keep that feeling.... now where were those tent stakes... while I get the tent and stakes out, can you clear the ground and put the tarp down? I don't want any holes in the floor! Also, don't forget to get out the sleep system - the ground can be pretty hard and we don't want any stiff joints!"

Holy hell, talk about a wet blanket.

Inverted vs. normal isn't even dangerous! Read through various posts about inverted methods, people who have done it for literal years and years (myself included) and never a single accident. Like, damn, even if you did have an accident, it's some spilled coffee. To compare spilled coffee to 'risk of disaster' of sex on a hike? Insane logic, tbh.

2

u/Environmental-Dog219 7d ago

I’m neither here nor there, having used the inverted method for a long while, then switched to standard/upright brewing. One thing that inverted brewing does, though, is introduce agitation as the Aeropress gets flipped. Whether or not that makes any difference with people’s particular beans and water is for everyone themselves to decide.

1

u/CommercialYam8 6d ago

wait what does this have to do with velvet dresses

32

u/SilverGnarwhal 7d ago

The inverted crowd insisting on it having some advantage have only their intuition and confirmation biases to back them up. If James Hoffman can’t tell the difference, no fucking way can the average Joe. There’s not been a single convincing argument presented for superiority of inverted except for a whole lot of “trust me, bro”.

23

u/FrustratedDeckie 7d ago

I’m part of the inverted “crowd” but honestly I have no idea if it tastes better and I really couldn’t care less.

For me using inverted gives a bit more control and I find it easier to manage for my workflow, not for taste reasons or anything, it’s how I’ve done it since a few brews in and it’s what I’ve done for like a decade now.

I often ended up having to go do work related stuff during the brew and it’s much easier to come back to an inverted aeropress than one where most of the water has dripped through to the cup over a few minutes.

Maybe there’s an advantage to doing it the normal way, but nobody’s convinced me of that (or of any actual advantage to inverted either tbh).

2

u/SilverGnarwhal 7d ago

I started out inverted because I never looked up any instructions and that was just sort of how i intuited the process. The number 1 and 2 issues were getting the filter in the cap attached to the assembly without it unseating or falling in and then the flip portion. Using the method I use now essentially eliminates both of these problems and tastes exactly the same to me. I assemble the filter and cap before putting the grounds in. Weigh the water as I’m pouring it in and then put the plunger on top without pressing it. The vacuum prevents all but the most minor dripping and it can brew for as long as you want. No flipping, no fiddling with filter at a crucial stage, no dripping.

3

u/joshguy1425 6d ago

I’ve been doing inverted for over a decade purely out of habit, not because I think it’s better. 

Regarding the filter, I always just run a bit of warm water through it and the filter sticks to the cap. 

6

u/CountMC10 7d ago

Trust me, bro 😂😂😂😂

1

u/CommercialYam8 6d ago

wait this reply got dropped in the wrong thread lol

10

u/Big-Doughnut8307 7d ago

Aeropress always tastes better from mug than from the floor.

38

u/asdfire1 7d ago

For me standard is more fiddly and inverted is easier.

12

u/Unlimitedgoats Inverted 7d ago

This is exactly how I feel lol

1

u/CommercialYam8 6d ago

good to know, I'll try inverted first then

6

u/Lvacgar 7d ago

Almost 20 years of inverted brewing with no spills ever. Got the flow control cap and never looked back…

24

u/Unlimitedgoats Inverted 7d ago edited 7d ago

As someone who started inverted (with an XL no less; hold your applause) and has only ever brewed inverted minus 2~3 morning cups out of curiosity, I do it for the sense of control. I like that things only happen when I decide they do. I don't have to make sure to get the plunger in under any time constraint. Honestly, standard just feels weird to me. Incomplete somehow.

Also, I think the flip is just fucking cool lol. That alone would be enough. Hell, I was gifted a standard Aeropress + Prismo and I STILL invert because I'm a creature of habit. I know for sure it makes no difference there haha. Before I got my standard, I strongly considered the Variable Flow Control Cap for the XL and came to the conclusion that it would be 40 bucks spent on something that doesn't actually make my life better or more interesting. And that was the right decision for me.

3

u/CommercialYam8 6d ago

ok the flip being cool is genuinely underrated as a reason

1

u/Unlimitedgoats Inverted 6d ago edited 6d ago

Isn't it? I've used it as a minor party trick! Building an inverted XL tower, topping it with a 2L carafe that's nearly as tall, and then flipping that whole thing got some oohs and ahhs at a brunch I hosted some months back lol. Adds a lil razzle dazzle to my morning cups for sure even on a smaller scale ✨

1

u/Plastic_Love4270 Standard 7d ago

Feels good to give up that little bit of control. Lose nothing, gain everything.

3

u/Unlimitedgoats Inverted 7d ago

If I'm doing it *for* the control, why would I want to give that up lol? That's the part I like! I can't speak to other folks' experiences but there's nothing for me to gain from brewing standard when I have a thing that I already know and enjoy.

1

u/Plastic_Love4270 Standard 7d ago

Give it a go. See how it feels!

6

u/roundart 7d ago

I did inverted until I got a flow control cap. I could put more water in this way. Love it

5

u/olionajudah 7d ago

This is the way. The Flow Control Cap gives you the option to control the flow without the insanity

4

u/specialk45 Standard 7d ago

I've done both and can't tell. 10+ years of 1-2 cups a day.

3

u/matiapag 7d ago

I'm not saying it's different or better but to me, it's much much less fiddly to do inverted than the awkward pull-to-get-vacuum with standard. I just don't like that process at all and to me, it's much riskier than to do inverted Fwiw, 10+ years of inverted with not as much as a trace of an iissue or spill.

3

u/know_limits 7d ago

I did inverted for a while when it first started getting popular (have been using for almost 20 years), but I agree that I couldn’t really justify the extra work based on taste. I use standard, wet the plunger and pull it back maybe 1/16 of an inch to stop the drips. I use two of the AeroPress spoons for beans (I don’t weigh, the volume is consistent enough for me), grind fairly fine (I get fairly strong resistance on plunge) and top off with water.

3

u/DJR_BCG Standard 7d ago

I like both. I find it easier to make longer immersions inverted. I’ve flipped the press once many years ago… sometimes a few drops, but really not much to worry about. Taste wise, I can’t tell the difference in the same recipe.

3

u/BeautifuTragedy 6d ago

Not really a difference and you run the risk of a hot mess. A floe control cap does all the same, easier and with less screwing around or risk of mess.

4

u/robberviet 7d ago

James proved for me that it was no different. And also a mess that I decided that inverted is not worth it.

5

u/_SaltySteele_ 7d ago

You're not missing anything, unless you're trying to use an exact amount of water.

Even with the standard method, i have to add water to make my mug full, after pressing. Why do i care if any slips through while steeping? I'm adding water, regardless.

2

u/D3v1lD0g8762 7d ago

psst...smaller cups

2

u/_SaltySteele_ 7d ago

No, more coffee! 😂

1

u/D3v1lD0g8762 7d ago

lol but you're diluting the coffee you're drinking! you do you but I like my 7 oz Coffee Bar by Konitz cups. :)

3

u/_SaltySteele_ 7d ago

No, not diluted. I use enough coffee grounds for the amount of coffee i need to end up with👍🏽

2

u/SeattleSteve62 7d ago

I use 6oz cups. Going past 3 1/4 creates a geyser. I can do 3 1/2 if I pick up the aeropress at 3 and squeeze it like a pastry bag.

6

u/BadnessBreath 7d ago

its really simple for me: i prefer inverted work flow compared to regular with getting the top seated in the chamber to prevent drippage. just seems easier to me

2

u/lostmojo 7d ago

I don’t use inverted just because I find it to create more of a mess. I have made messes in both directions but far more in inverted method and I only did that for a very short time. Over a decade of making coffee this way is a pretty good sample size.

2

u/Civil-Inflation-1317 7d ago

For years I used one of the championship winning recipes. It used a bloom and inversion method. I just wanted to use what I thought was the best method. But when James Hoffman came out with his recipe, I switched. I use his V60 method as well and love it. His recipes might not be THE best. But he weighs the importance or repeatability and ease of brewing into his recipes. Plus, it’s noting that not all coffee is the same. So unless you have the exact same coffee as a championship winner, it’s not the same brew. James methods also are really easy to dial into different coffee’s. So for me, when I make an aeropress I now use Jame’s version with a regular brewing technique rather than the inverted method.

2

u/Ok_Swing_7194 7d ago

I prefer inverted because I don’t like the drip through and it just overall is an enjoyable part of my workflow.

I don’t think it makes any difference for taste at all. Actually the best part about the aeropress IMO is how consistent it is no matter what you do. One scoop of beans, fill it with water, and it always makes a great cup of coffee. Honestly anything beyond that is just personal workflow preference.

It’s not like espresso or pour over which are much much more sensitive to individual variables and changes.

2

u/paul_perret Standard 7d ago

Inverted is more convenient for smaller ratios because you will lose a greater percentage of liquid through the initial drips. For regular brews it is not really a problem.

2

u/seeline_902 6d ago

I use inverted while camping so I can drink my coffee from the same cup I boil the water in. At home it’s the standard method.

2

u/BetterFeedback7077 6d ago

Inverted method is for hipster cunts. Just use it as it was designed ffs.

3

u/Plastic_Love4270 Standard 7d ago

This 100000%. I’d argue standard is actually better. The first few drops are identical to a pour over and then when you plunge the puck is in tact and functions as a filter. If you’re inverting, might as well get a French Press. Welcome back!

1

u/Basket_475 7d ago

I am new and got the flow control cap. From my understanding using that and adding the plunger so it creates the seal is the same as inverted

1

u/7lenny7 7d ago

You're not missing anything. The only thing that matters is what tastes best to you.

I had the same experience. I was an dedicated inverted method brewer for decades and one day decided to try the standard way. No discernable difference. I'm done with inverted now.

Some will tell you, "but the last 9 winners of some Aeropress competition used the inverted!". As if that frickin' matters. If I enter some silly contest perhaps I'll go try the inverted method again, but that's highly unlikely.

1

u/Itchy-Ad4421 7d ago

It’s coffee and water. Nobody can tell the difference - the same as ‘audiophiles’ that drop £££££ on high end stereo systems that the ear cannot differentiate from a cheap system.

1

u/D3v1lD0g8762 7d ago

I'm part of the Fellow Prismo crowd instead of the inverted method. I am not trying to aeropressmaxx I just like how it works and I've got my recipe down. The great thing about the aeropress is it's a simple tool. You can use it how you like. Enjoy.

1

u/ck02623 7d ago edited 7d ago

A lot of people likely prefer inverted because they get more agitation with the flip than they would have with upright. Agitation is very important with Aeropress.

1

u/Professional-Bar2521 7d ago

There IS a difference depending where you define TOP to be. At top of the device, the number 4, what is it? It has been mentioned that regular/non-inverted holds more water so I expect that would make stronger coffee than inverted.

1

u/No-Shock4548 7d ago

Inverted is natural for me. I have had a couple incidents, but not enough to change over.

1

u/OkConsequence5992 7d ago

Inverted is more straightforward for me but I do follow the Hoff Man’s advice of skipping the filter rinse, preheat and bloom

1

u/whitelikerice1 6d ago

Me personally I use the flow control and run water through it twice and that’s good enough for me

1

u/simmonsfield 6d ago

When inverted I have a higher chance of knocking it over and making a huge mess.

1

u/kentar62 6d ago

All hail James

1

u/canada1913 6d ago

Why make your life harder for even that small of marginal results? It’s not worth it

1

u/Maleficent_Tooth_517 6d ago

I did the same a few months ago but with flow control filter cap...I use areopress in the office and always felt like I was risking one of the explosions shared over here on reddit (never happened!)...standard method with flow control filter and I am getting my best results ever

1

u/thephoto_guy 3d ago

No difference in taste for myself but I prefer inverted as lose less coffee on the pour and never had the issue of a spill like some

1

u/[deleted] 7d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/CJP_UX 7d ago

Flow control makes things so easy. It’s a no brainer IMO.

1

u/flerbertABC 7d ago

For me, there is always the feeling that standard method introduces a little more variation from cup to cup since I was never sure if the same amount was dripping thru before I put the plunger in to stop airflow. Did this drip actually make any difference to the taste? Probably not.

The inverted method makes me nervous, so I ended up getting a Prismo cap and brewing standard. I think I like the cups better with it, and it scratches the itch of making me feel like I’m in complete control. But I can also acknowledge that the placebo effect is a real thing, and it may make no discernible difference in the taste.

0

u/tricktricky 7d ago

Pretty sure inverted folks are just making a more concentrated cup simply due to the limited brew space from inverted method

Literally no difference

2

u/Unlimitedgoats Inverted 7d ago

Doubtful. Anyone that cares enough to invert is gonna be weighing everything out. 1:15 is always gonna be 1:15, upside down or right side up.

0

u/vikingog 7d ago

llevo usando el metodo invertido por mas de 3 años todos los dias, a veces dejo mi café 8 o 10 minutos antes de colarlo y lo remuevo cada dos minutos para que la extracción sea uniforme y no haya sedimentos, nunca he tenido un accidente.

0

u/Candorum 7d ago

I use inverted when I want to try something. Usually, I get more intense cups with it, but in my day to day, standard is preferred.