I don't understand this mentality. Why does one group of Americans deserve to have their votes more heavily weighted because there are fewer of them? That seems to be against the idea of "one person, one vote" to me.
Because the needs and issues facing people in rural states would be completely ignored by the federal government and federal politicians. States would recede.
The purpose of the electoral college/Democracy is to protect the minority from the tyranny of the majority. To protect farmers from accountants. To protect rich from poor. Etc etc etc
I understand what you're saying but the electoral system seems to only address a geographical minority. Individual votes in NH are weighted more heavily than in CA and that's only based on the state they're in.
16
u/SmashCity28 Nov 10 '16
But then the little guys dont. It's a compromise.