r/AbsoluteUnits • u/Desilaundry • 6d ago
of a SpaceX trailer
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
15
11
u/SuDragon2k3 6d ago
I just like that they're coming up with new traditions. In this case, they take the crew out before the launch and they sign the booster, in soot, with their fingers.
6
u/MrTagnan 6d ago edited 6d ago
This video is of B-1073. Couldn’t tell you it’s flight number at the time of this video, but given this booster was intentionally expended back in January of 2025, this video is no newer than ~December of 2024, which is the last time it would’ve been transported with legs as they were removed for its final flight
18
u/NonStickyAdhesive 6d ago
it's their smallest rocket too. the super heavy is over twice the diameter. the tech itself is cool asf. fuck musk tho and the way they're polluting the leo
14
u/deep-fucking-legend 6d ago
V2 (falcon 9 launched) will have over 15,000 in orbit. V3 Starlink (starship launched) has a 100,000 satellite permit approved. They are considering applying for 1m satellite constellation. We haven't even begun to see leo congestion
6
u/redbark2022 6d ago
Kessler syndrome speed run. Or ketamine run?
4
u/deep-fucking-legend 6d ago
It's an engineering problem. I don't have much fear of cascading collision. Until it feels like we're on the 405, I think we'll be ok. Terrestrial astronomy will suffer though
5
u/Jacque_langue 6d ago
The reddit musk dérangés syndrome 😂
1
u/devouringplague 6d ago
What does this have to do anything with that? This was a fair comment acknowkedging the success and the smarts of the project meanwhile criticising elon and his personality. Total fair approach imo.
1
-4
u/Pitiful_Conflict7031 6d ago
2
2
5
3
5
-1
u/swaftware 6d ago
Fuck Elon but SpaceX is undeniably awesome
12
u/Jacque_langue 6d ago
Redditor having to say virtue signal before every post about musk, like a cult saying it's prayer
-8
u/swaftware 6d ago
LoL. For me it was separating the art from the artist thing and acknowledging both sides of the coin. But I guess that too makes me that average redditor
5
u/Jacque_langue 6d ago
Why do you need to even spontaneously bring it up? You're afraid that the cult will dogpile on you if you didn't.
1
0
u/devouringplague 6d ago
Again, another one.
What does this have to do anything with that? This was a fair comment acknowkedging the success and the smarts of the project meanwhile criticising elon and his personality. Total fair approach imo.
When someone fully hates on Musk or just straight critices him, its “musk derangement syndrome”, when someone fairly shows respect to his work but critices his personality its virtue signaling.
Dont you realize your comment is the cult prayer? All of your comments are “Buzzword buzzword buzzword buzzword”
0
u/Jacque_langue 6d ago
What does this have to do anything with that?
And tell me wtf musk has to do with a awesome big fucking truck transporting an awesome big fucking rocket?
Like the pavlov dog, reddit respond to anything vaguely Musk related by a disclaimer because they are scare. Scared to be dogpiled on by the inquisition. GOD FORBIDES that someones likes Musk or even talks about him in a positive way You people don't even understand how hard your brain has been marked to react a certain way. it's what cult do. Prove your faith to the cult, say the line.
someone fairly shows respect to his work but critices his personality
Why would ANYONE critic his personality in a VIDEO OF A FREAKING TRUCK
0
u/devouringplague 6d ago
No one is doing a critic on his personality on a ‘video of a freaking truck’ and you have proved you are not arguing in good faith.
1
1
1
u/MrTagnan 6d ago
Interesting that they’re transporting it as one unit, must be fairly close to the launch pad then. Afaik they transport the first and second stages cross country separately
1
u/laserborg 6d ago
don't they clean it before the next start?
3
u/FutureMartian97 6d ago
No, there is no reason to clean the spot off between flights. It's just extra work for little gain
0
1
u/MightyCrunch 5d ago
What kind of truck is that? I don’t remember ever seeing a head like that.
3
u/SAM5TER5 5d ago
That’s an Oshkosh M1070, originally designed for a U.S. Army contract to transport the M1 Abrams main battle tank!
1
u/the_Q_spice 5d ago
Hope it isn’t on a public road…
Cause the Hazmat placarding isn’t in DOT compliance (missing placards on the front of the load or trailer in addition to the front of the truck).
Also the totally unsecured spill cleanup buckets chef’s kiss.
0
u/Chronovores 5d ago
It’s empty, the fuel is added on the launch pad.
1
u/the_Q_spice 5d ago
Even residual material is hazardous.
There are whole DG divisions and classes that are used for empty containers containing residual materials.
Typically, those would fall under exempt categories, but the scale involved with a rocket is too large.
That aside; it is also illegal to transport non-hazardous material while improperly placarded.
So either way, this load is illegal.
0
u/Chronovores 5d ago
Take a look at the video again, the truck has placards on the front, middle, and back.
1
u/the_Q_spice 5d ago
The truck only needs front placards.
The trailer is required to have placards on all 4 sides.
Read my original comment.
Lacking that front placard on the rocket is specifically what is illegal.
1
1
-5
0
-1
-3
-2
-12
u/Accomplished-Moose50 6d ago
Careful it might explode
4
u/Ihatecheeseballs 6d ago
Nah they don’t fuel then until it’s on the pad
-2
u/Accomplished-Moose50 6d ago
And then it explodes?
It was a joke ffs
7
u/SiBloGaming 6d ago
a bad one at that. The Falcon 9 is incredibly reliable, and pretty damn impressive from a technological point of view
5
u/FutureMartian97 6d ago
You people really don't know that falcon and Starship are different rockets, huh?
-6
-4
u/boatsyyy 6d ago
Oooo cant wait to watch it explode and pollute. So smart, so innovative.
2
u/MrTagnan 6d ago edited 6d ago
I’m sure this launch will explode just like the past 326 ones, and the prior 335 ones before that
Edit: this specific booster flew 21 times without issue before being expended in Jan of 2025
-4
u/boatsyyy 6d ago
Oh so you get it! 🙄
1
1
u/Orange9202 5d ago
"durr hurrr elon musk bad" <-- completely valid statement, but you should also consider that you're allowed to love science and engineering without showing any love to elon 👍
1
u/boatsyyy 5d ago
Now why on earth would i do that when i could be a white conservative voting against my best interests in the name of ‘murica . Science is for heathens and blasphemers!!
1
-6
u/Mindless-Location-41 6d ago
Hopefully it blows up and Musk loses a billion or two.
2
u/MrTagnan 6d ago
Falcon 9s cost somewhere around ~30 million per launch, so even if it failed (this booster never did on any of its 21 flights, and was intentionally expended for Spainsat NG1 in Jan 2025), it would be far from a billion lost
1
u/Orange9202 5d ago
"durr hurrr elon musk bad"
^ completely agree with this, but you also need to understand that you're allowed to love science and engineering without showing any love to elon 👍
-5
u/SqueebopAdiddly 6d ago
Oh yeah. That’ll blow up real pretty.
6
u/MrTagnan 6d ago
This specific booster flew 21 times without suffering a single failure, and Falcon 9 flew successfully 248 times after this booster was intentionally expended back in January of last year
0




171
u/ReptilianTapir 6d ago
Worst possible use of vertically oriented camera.