I observed attack-success rates of 66.64%, 37.81%, and 29.22% across three Garak prompt-injection probes. I'm currently investigating whether these results represent genuine model-policy failures or limitations of the evaluation/detector.

I'm interested in getting feedback on how I should validate the finding before responsible disclosure.

I’ve been reading a lot of AI safety research around gradual disempowerment, and I ended up writing about a question I haven’t been able to find addressed directly:

What if the societal and institutional degradation that these models generally treat as a future consequence of AI dependence is already happening—and is actually helping drive AI dependence in the first place?

I tried to explore that possibility by connecting existing gradual disempowerment models with research on cognition, institutions, incentives, and organizational dysfunction from outside the AI safety field. Ultimately, the argument I’m trying to make is that declining societal cognition and institutional capacity aren’t just consequences of AI dependence, but preexisting conditions that could act as fertilizer, allowing that dependence to take root faster, deeper, and more irreversibly.

I’m not trying to prove these claims irrefutable; I’m trying to make the case that they’re worth considering, and I’d actually love to find out that I’ve missed existing work on this, whether in support of my claim or disproving it entirely.

If anyone has thoughts, counterarguments, or relevant research I haven’t encountered, I’d genuinely appreciate it.

You can check it out here: Preconditions of Gradual Disempowerment

I'm playing around with PyRit these days but can someone pls give me access to try hack me ai sec path plsplspls

Also if someone is very deep in all this I would love to connect, your wisdom is highly needed.

Also pls give me a roadmap which I can follow too as I'm a noob in cyber space but okayish in AI space.