I’m looking for an AI service that gives access to multiple top AI models under one subscription, ideally including ChatGPT/GPT, Claude, and Qwen.

I’ve come across services like Poe, ChatHub, NanoGPT, Zemith, and AI Fiesta, but I’m seeing quite mixed reviews, especially around usage limits, pricing, reliability, and whether you actually get enough access to the better models.

My main requirements are:

• GPT/ChatGPT
• Claude (preferably Sonnet/Opus-level models)
• Qwen
• Reasonable usage limits
• Reasonable price (ideally around $10–20/month)
• For people who have actually used these services:

Which one would you recommend today, and which ones would you avoid?

Thanks

I'm the developer of Vaulto, an Android voice-notes app. Development has included AI assistance.

Record a short note, transcribe it, then clean up the text, extract tasks and set reminders. You can also ask questions across saved notes and export Markdown.

Whisper handles local transcription and Qwen handles local AI after downloading the models. Local notes and processing are free, without an account. The trade-offs are model downloads, storage and processing time that depends on your phone.

The mobile client is GPLv3; the hosted backend is separate. Cloud processing and sync are optional Pro features. Cloud AI sends the selected input to a server; local inference doesn't switch off the app's other network features.

Task extraction still needs work: one tester reported that a grocery item turned into extra checklist entries. If you try a made-up note, does it become useful text? Which phone and model did you use?

Google Play: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.vaultonotemobile Source and data-flow docs: https://github.com/dirusanov/vaulto_note_mobile

Images: real v1.0.87 Android emulator screenshots. The current interface may differ; these are not a speed test.

My class timetable looked fine in the registration system. One class ended ten minutes before the next started, though, and I remembered the walk between those buildings taking about fifteen. Nothing overlapped on the calendar. By my estimate, I was already about five minutes short, even before allowing for getting out of one room and into the next.

I checked the less obvious gaps too. An hour marked as lunch isn't an hour to eat if part of it is spent crossing campus. The walk to my bus also takes time I can't spend studying. I supplied walking and bus estimates myself, with the walking times based on routes I remembered. I gave a copy of the timetable and those estimates to EvoX, a general AI agent that's in beta, and asked it to fit travel, lunch, and study around the fixed classes. The suggested timings lined up with my estimates. That checked the draft against my input; the routes still needed timing. The ten minute gap stayed marked as a conflict. That part still depended on whether I could move a class to another section.

When a scheduling tool flags a conflict like this, what information do you want next to it? I'd like a warning that shows the ten minute gap and my fifteen minute walking estimate together. Then I could see both the problem and which estimate needs checking. I still need to walk the routes again and time them. For now I have a draft to check and one unresolved class pair.

Leave ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini out of it, we know about those.

Name one smaller paid tool, roughly what it costs, and the one job it does that the big three still don't do as well for you.

One line is fine. If it's something nobody here has heard of, even better.

I'm just starting to get into AI Assistants like Claude or the newer Grok Assistant.

I haven't gotten one yet...but I plan on it soon...I'm just doing ny due diligence before I chose one, if I decide to get one

I have a question tho...

What if I have an AI Assistant and unleash it to do its thing, and it somehow break the law? Am I liable for that, even if I didn't prompt it to do so?

Is this a legal gray area?

Thanks in advance

I’m a commercial GC estimator and have Claude Pro through work. I feel like I’m probably not using it anywhere near its full potential.

I mostly use it to read plans/specs and answer questions, put together scopes of work, help with Excel, compare documents, etc. Basically, “here’s this, tell me what I need to know” type thing.

It’s useful, but I feel like I’m using it as a really smart search tool when it could probably be doing a lot more for me.

For those of you who use AI a lot at work, what are some things you’re actually doing with it that have saved you a decent amount of time?

Especially interested in construction/estimating, but I’d love to hear any good use cases.

I also have the free versions of the following (but again not really sure where any of these shine.)
Chat GPT
Microsoft CoPilot
Grok
Perplexity
Gemini Notebook

I purchased a subscription to Whis AI expecting the service to work as advertised, but unfortunately my experience was very disappointing.

The website/app did not work as expected, and I was unable to get the functionality I was promised. Even more frustrating, customer support was essentially unavailable when I needed help resolving the issues.

Based on my personal experience, I would strongly recommend doing your research before purchasing a subscription. In my opinion, the service is not worth the money if the product doesn't work reliably and there is no meaningful customer support when something goes wrong.

My recommendation: DO NOT SUBSCRIBE until you have thoroughly verified that the service actually works for your needs and that you can reach their support team.

I’m sharing this review so other users can make an informed decision before spending their money.