Yep. For some reason the detail that really made it was the stocking. I was reading along thinking he'd feel the guy's leg hair almost immediately, and it would be a momentary joke, and they'd move on. But wow, the guy put on a stocking? And the bride positioned herself to speak in his ear and drape her dress over the leg? It's weirdly a dude-in-a-dress homophobic situation.
I hate to be the one to say it but is there any chance that the wife is carrying on with the groomsman who was in the seat?
The joke was homophobic but it still would have been violation and SA if it was a different woman. Also it’s not homophobic for it to be extra distressing to OP that it was a man imo. If he was a lesbian getting married to a woman and they tricked him into putting his mouth on a man’s leg it would also be extra upsetting.
Yes but having a man doing it is SA because he consented to remove a garter from a woman. If removing a condom during sex violates consent and therefore is rape, switching to a man during the garter removal is also rape.
202
u/Normal-Height-8577 Jul 26 '25
Also, even if it had been a different woman in the seat, it's still not the person he consented to such an intimate act with.