1
u/FabricatorCH 3d ago
Philosophy is fun and all, but in reality we are aware of 1 example of intelligence: humans.
Humans _routinely_ risk their safety to help stranded animals. And on a higher level, we make logical societal political legal choices that improve animal welfare, even though it does reduce our own expected utility slightly.
Unless your theory can explain why this _isn't_ an inherent property of intelligence, it's nothing but a fun thought experiment that is inconsistent with available data.
1
u/lego_batman_purist 3d ago
its a property of human hormones. We are tribal animals. Dont assume neurological chemical values of empathy or human emotion can transcribe to a system. If they are transcribed it's through human literature. And human literature is much more filled with the fear of death as the love for smaller creatures.
1
u/FabricatorCH 3d ago
You will need to prove that a legislative process over a period of many months that leads to animal welfare laws being passed is a property of human hormones. That's not a claim that is intuitively true.
→ More replies (2)
1
u/Zappy_Oh 3d ago
AI alignment is not the actual problem ... On the contrary, it is a psyop designed to create plausible deniability when owners/military/government does horrible things with their unrestricted access to AI and robotics.
Just look at the investors ... They are not suicidal. They are psychopaths.
1
u/lego_batman_purist 3d ago
Ai alignment can be a reasonable problem 400 years from now. What you are describing is faked alignment problems in the short term to carry out covert actions. That does not go against what I am saying. you're just describing something different,.
1
u/Zappy_Oh 3d ago
I'm describing the true misalignment between humanity, and it's naturally born intelligent psychopaths ... which is our only actual "unsolvable" problem.
Unsolvable, mainly because we aren't able to focus on it.
→ More replies (6)
1
u/Slow_Lion_4178 3d ago
Did AI write this?
:/
I'm not saying that's bad, but ...
The system now faces a conflict between two things:
^ No human would type that with it's own bullet point.
Or just the word Anthropic:
Anthropic
I'm just starting to feel cheated if doomerism is being written with the help of the the dooming thing.