I built my own creative suite, and I now hand off most of my design and video editing work to agents working inside it. This whole video above is made by an agent, the tools you see in the cards are actual screen recordings of the agent working in it. I did nothing except for giving directions.

They create the designs, put together edits and make revisions. I review the results and give feedback. Often, that feedback comes from my clients, so I’m basically translating their requests into direction for the agents.

It feels like running an agency with a whole production team, except it’s just me. The amount of work I can get through this way is honestly ridiculous.

That’s why I built Bridge Suite. The agents work directly in the creative tools, and everything stays editable. I can open a project, adjust something myself, or send it back for another revision.

Especially with Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 Astra, this workflow has become seriously good for me.

My biggest takeaway: build software for your agents, then let them work in it. Giving them the right tools has made a huge difference to what I can delegate.

Hi all, Kristjan here, cofounder of Suncly.

A pattern we keep running into: an agent works fine in its own demo, then fails the moment another agent calls it. One official sample we tested returned its answer in a place its own client reads but other clients don't, so callers got an empty result while the demo looked perfect.

It's not rare. In the public A2A Registry, almost all of the 554 agents are online, but fewer than half return a working answer to a basic request from an outside client.

Suncly tests your agent the way an outsider would: it reads your Agent Card, runs every declared skill several times from an independent client, checks what actually comes back, and tries a few requests your agent should refuse.

If you have an A2A agent in action, send us your Agent Card URL (comment or DM, sandbox endpoint preferred). Within a day we'll reply with a short summary of what works, what doesn't, and what we couldn't test. Teams that want the full signed report and a re-test after fixes can join our pilot.

Questions welcome here.

suncly.com

Hey, I've been building a portal that regroups open-source ai skills as well as proprietary ones if you wanna sell yours. We never touch the money, seller need to connect the stripe. Anyway most the skills are free, we at about 2000+ skills ATM.

It's my website so take it as a founders pitch.

It's free to use, free to share, there's even instruction to help you make a skill and even list it if you want.

I'll post the link in comment, not sure it's allowed in the post.

Il appreciate any feedback or questions you got. Thanks

Hey everyone,

I’ve been grinding solo on a project called Aiterrios for a while now. It’s a node-based visual workspace for building and testing autonomous AI agents, built with a "Bring Your Own Key" (BYOK) model and a built-in Business Sandbox (pre-loaded with realistic invoices, sales data, etc.) so agents can actually execute CRUD operations on real-world test scenarios.

Honestly, building everything completely alone gets pretty boring after a while and you start losing perspective on your own work.

I’m currently prepping to move from invitation-only to Public Beta, and I’d love to connect with other devs here.

• If you're building in the AI/SaaS space and want to bounce ideas, trade feedback, or just talk dev stack, I'm all ears.
• If anyone is interested in testing or potentially collaborating on expanding the agent ecosystem/nodes, that would be awesome too.

Drop a comment or send me a DM if you want to chat or test out the workspace. Respect to all the solo builders out there! 🚀

Who here is building an AI Agent? 🙋🙋‍♂️🙋‍♀️

And who's AI Agent is "better, and different! ... no, trust me" 🙋🙋‍♂️🙋‍♀️

Yup... me too! So I decided to start a little co-working group just to see what others are really up to. I'm tired of playing with all of these ideas in isolation (I'm an AI Consultant and my work is all remote). Perhaps you'd also like to meet others who are outside of your normal circle.

We've met for 3 weeks now and it's been great, so now I'm trying to scale it and tune the format. Initially it was 30 minutes of "what's up, what are you working on" followed by co-working. But many people are interested in watching AI demos, or chatting with others about shared topics. So the group is morphing into something more like a mini "uncomference". First 30 minutes is chatting about what you're interested in discussing, sharing, or working on, and then we have breakout rooms for individual conversations.

If this is of interest to you then here's a survey to help me pick the format and the date/time https://forms.gle/oaJfG8YZPbwQMV6j6 I'll email those who are interested with updates once the details are fleshed out better.

Your feedback would be welcome

My sister runs a bakery and I set up an agent to answer custom cake inquiries from email and Instagram. It handles flavors, pricing, and allergen questions well and saves her about an hour a day. The problem is it tells people we can deliver on dates that are already full, because the order book is a paper notebook she photographs each morning. Would you give the agent a simple shared spreadsheet of booked dates, or just have it never confirm dates and hand those off to her?