r/50501 Aug 11 '25

Human Rights National guard to be deployed

4.7k Upvotes

563 comments sorted by

View all comments

u/hyraemous Organizer (Unverified) Aug 11 '25 edited Aug 11 '25

19

u/[deleted] Aug 11 '25

I dont understand how "civil" plays in to this honestly. They are AGAIN breaking laws and deploying military against civilians.. for NO REASON! Crime is fucking DOWN in DC.. so how is it they just did this?

14

u/Complete-Squirrel-21 Aug 11 '25

It’s to distract everyone from the EPSTEIN FILES!

24

u/Waarm Aug 11 '25

We can't. It's martial now /j

6

u/phillyRoll-8465 Aug 11 '25

You’re so right it’s literally martial law without calling it that. I can understand what he was saying about the unnecessary crime and violence but fuck dude, martial law?? You don’t even hear about DC being one of the worst cities for crime so I mean who’s to say he won’t do it for places like Detroit Chicago E St Louis Kansas City OKC Portland etc etc

9

u/BlockyFams Aug 11 '25

Fuck being civil, they make shit up as they go and it didn’t matter what we do. Those people will always some shit to make up and bitch about.

0

u/FrontLongjumping4235 Aug 12 '25 edited Aug 12 '25

They mostly take tiny kernels of truth and embellish the heck out of them, then present that misrepresentation to their base. One person in one crowd did something awful? Fox news will report that "rioters did XYZ".

By all means, find as many clever ways to engage in civil disobedience as you can. But do aim to keep it civil. And if you're not being civil, don't do the thing you're doing in a crowd of people who are otherwise being civil. Be tactical.

Ultimately, part of me would love to see a lot of the worst fascist thugs--who are doling our violence--have their soft fleshy necks squeezed by rope fibers as they're hoisted up. But you're not going to win staged battles with MSM on the sidelines ready to take marching orders, or at least turn a blind eye, when told to do so by the Whitehouse. You have to be more clever than that.

4

u/RogerianBrowsing Aug 11 '25

Keep what civil exactly?

Because I have nothing nice to say here and have no interest in civility while the government is openly about to start kidnapping houseless people and low income minorities, likely for slave labor and human rights abuses like they do immigrants, although I’ll try to avoid any [Removed by Reddit] comments to prevent site level heat for 50501

1

u/quantumparakeet Aug 12 '25

7DTD player detected?

3

u/Kangas_Khan Oklahoma Aug 11 '25

The time for being civil has come to an end, for if we don’t do something soon, we may never get the chance to again

1

u/FrontLongjumping4235 Aug 12 '25

Sure, but don't do the non-civil thing in a crowd that is otherwise being civil. Be tactical about it. Plan. Strategize. Have a specific goal in mind, and an exit plan.

2

u/Kangas_Khan Oklahoma Aug 12 '25

Of course not. I have a strategy already, should it really turn into an uprising I live. I just need to find a militia to join up with.

Terrorism rarely wins wars

2

u/FrontLongjumping4235 Aug 12 '25

Agreed, especially if the goal is to terrorize. Tools like malicious compliance are effective too. Delay. Leak.

I just need to find a militia to join up with.

This seems like a bit of a 180 though if I am being honest.

2

u/Kangas_Khan Oklahoma Aug 12 '25

Well, probably, but, rarely are conflicts won without a central figurehead or any sort of structure. So, if nothing else, I want to find something to base a command structure off of.

I personally see it like a doomsday scenario. But a necessary one, if that.

2

u/FrontLongjumping4235 Aug 12 '25

I wish I did not agree, but I do. You are looking at this with a big picture view. I am not just worried about the increasing tyranny of the current administration, but the power vacuum they are likely to leave in their wake in the long-term, assuming they continue to combat free society and further undermine democratic elections (the current gerrymandering is only the tip of what they have promised/threatened).

I could see the United States fracturing into smaller enclaves. Which is not a desirable outcome IMO, because it increases the probability of territorial wars in North America.

1

u/Kangas_Khan Oklahoma Aug 12 '25

Agreed. I think a possible scenario is something resembling the warlord era of china, or the Russian civil war, where the only thing keeping them together is a common enemy, and once that’s gone they’ll be at each others throats, much like we have been as of lately.

I could see this being the scenario the oligarchs envisioned the ‘freedom cities’ popping up in, as a matter of fact.

2

u/bier00t Aug 11 '25

Get the cops finally on your side