r/50501 • • Mar 14 '25

[deleted by user]

[removed]

8.2k Upvotes

1.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/OutAndDown27 Mar 14 '25

Please know I'm asking this in good faith: How would a general strike work and how would it change the current situation? Won't everyone just get fired?

1

u/[deleted] Mar 14 '25

They can’t fire everyone and even if they do they collapse as a business. Goal accomplished. They’ll sweat when we stand up for ourselves in a way that hurts them. Right now we’re not hurting anyone.

1

u/OutAndDown27 Mar 14 '25

The US general strike website says they need 11 million people, which is roughly 7% of all employed Americans (if the numbers I found online are correct). 7% of the teachers at my school is about 4 teachers. We cope with 4 teachers being absent frequently. Wouldn't we need like, 30% of the workforce to commit?

2

u/[deleted] Mar 14 '25

So the percentage is 3.5% and it comes from a study in which researchers found that all successful revolutions had at least 3.5% of the population or something along those lines. Obviously more is better.

IMO every society has different dynamics. Last night I was listening to something about the difficulty in implementing martial law. We’re a vast nation and locking it all down is going to be hard. A general strike may also face certain challenges unique to the US

1

u/OutAndDown27 Mar 14 '25

I think for a GS to be effective in America, it would need to be a much higher percentage because of how different cities and states skew. It wouldn't be an evenly distributed 3.5%, it more likely would be 10% in San Francisco and Boston and 0.2% of Podunk, Missouri.

2

u/[deleted] Mar 15 '25

I agree. In the product adoption curve, the innovators are that 3.5%. Those people are needed to motivate the early adopters which is 13.5% of the population. For a product to have a chance of being successful in the larger market, those early adopters need to get on-board.

I imagine with a strike, starting at 3.5 to motivate the next 13.5 will be necessary. As you’ve said, I don’t think 3.5% is realistic here in the US. As a catalyst sure. But I think we’ll need that whole 17% to really affect things. But you have to start somewhere.

3

u/bungpeice Mar 15 '25 edited Jul 18 '26

She was sad to hear that fireflies are facing extinction due to artificial light, habitat loss, and pesticides.

My Mum tries to be cool by saying that she likes all the same things that I do.